this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
87 points (93.9% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3341 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The White House issued a brief but definitive response to the International Criminal Court’s warrants for Israeli officials, saying it “fundamentally rejects” the decision but ignored addressing the substance of the warrants.

“The United States has been clear that the ICC does not have jurisdiction over this matter. In coordination with partners, including Israel, we are discussing next steps.”

The administration of President Joe Biden has long warned against any such moves by the court after its chief prosecutor Karim Khan announced in May that he would, in fact, be seeking the arrest warrants.

In a statement at the time, Biden called the notion “outrageous”.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] distantsounds 55 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab 20 points 5 days ago

Biden is doing what all centrists want.

[–] danekrae 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I mean the list of US presidents who supported Israel to the extent Biden did is pretty short.

[–] danekrae 0 points 5 days ago

Biden is an embarrassment

Embarrassment is the key word... And besides, there is the next old guy...

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fuck Biden. Fuck genocide.

[–] mwproductions 7 points 5 days ago

Fuck 'em. Fuck 'em all. If they want to fight so badly, they can fight each other directly. Don't get the rest of us involved.

[–] TropicalDingdong 41 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

🤡 administration. Who gives a fuck about a genocide supporting Zionists opinion about this?

[–] jordanlund 18 points 5 days ago

"whatever the ICC might imply, there is no equivalence — none — between Israel and Hamas."

Well that's true... Israel has killed way more innocent people than Hamas ever has...

[–] NateNate60 16 points 5 days ago

Just so people can understand why the ICC claims jurisdiction, it is because the Palestinian Authority acting as the State of Palestine acceded to the Rome Statute of the ICC and thus became a state party in 2015. They pretty much did this with the express intention to give the ICC jurisdiction over alleged Israeli war crimes in occupied Palestinian territories. In 2019, ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda requested a ruling on the question of ICC jurisdiction in Palestine. In 2021 the ICC Pre-Trial Chamber ruled that Palestine's accession to the Rome Statute gave it jurisdiction over Palestinian territories occupied by Israeli forces (a.k.a. the West Bank and Gaza Strip).

Lebanon is not and has never been a state party or signatory, for those curious. Israel and the US are signatories but refused to ratify the treaty, and thus aren't state parties. Nonetheless, the ICC had decided that crimes committed in countries who have acceded or ratified its statute, or accepted its jurisdiction, are subject to ICC regardless of the citizenship or residency of the alleged perpetrators. This is also why it issued arrest warrants against Vladimir Putin despite neither Russia nor Ukraine being state parties; Ukraine accepted ICC jurisdiction on an ad hoc basis for crimes committed during the Russian invasion.

[–] Ensign_Crab 11 points 5 days ago

Centrists don't know what to call people who don't love genocide as much as they do now that they can't accuse them of being trump supporters.

[–] danekrae 13 points 5 days ago

Maybe the ICC and UN should just buy more weapons than israel. Then the shit hole country would be THEIR bitch instead of Benjamin's... After Putin has zipped up of course...

Money and racism seems to be the only motivation for that place.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Trump would gain so much support if instead of having a kangaroo court in the us to try people for bogus crimes he simple had Biden admin officials sent out to The Hague to be tried for real crimes

[–] shalafi 0 points 5 days ago

I'm kinda feelin' ya. Who and for what crimes? Be specific.