this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
101 points (96.3% liked)

Europe

1524 readers
662 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Germany's Economy Minister Robert Habeck, who is currently the Green Party's chancellor candidate in the upcoming elections, said that if elected, he would send Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has repeatedly asked his allies for long-range weapons so that the Ukrainian military can attack Russian logistics centers and military bases far behind the front line and within Russian territory.

But until now, Chancellor Olaf Scholz has chosen not to supply Taurus cruise missiles, saying they could enable Ukraine to also hit targets in the Russian capital Moscow.

[...]

Meanwhile, French President Emmanuel Macron reacted to the Russian air barrage on Ukraine, saying that Russian President Vladimir Putin "does not want peace and is not ready to negotiate."

"It's clear that President Putin intends to intensify the fighting," Macron said.

He made the remarks as he prepared to leave Argentina to attend the G20 Summit in Brazil.

[...]

The French president, however, said Ukraine's allies "must remain united .... on an agenda for genuine peace, that is to say, a peace that does not mean Ukraine's surrender."

Macron highlighted that his country's priority was to "equip, support and help Ukraine to resist."

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

It's kind of ironic and pretty bitter. The Greens were founded by environmentalists and pacifists.
Their slogan was "never again war, never again genocide"

And both times they were part of a government coalition, they immediately had to decide on an active involvement in a European war (Yugoslavia and Ukraine).
Cause in both wars, "never again war, never again genocide" wasn't an option.
They had to chose one, and they chose to get involved in the war to stop a genocide.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Pacifism doesn't mean you cannot defend yourself or surrender against an attacker.

And that's the whole point here: Ukraine isn't waging a war, they're defending against an invasion.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

But pacifism does usually mean you don't join a war where you aren't attacked yourself.
Which is the situation the German Greens are in.

Yes, Ukraine is legitimately, directly, currently defending itself.
Germany isn't.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

So helping someone who is being attacked and supporting them is "joining the war"?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Yes, of course it is. Why wouldn't it be?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

So if you eat at a restaurant, is the chef joining you for dinner because they're supplying you with food?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 28 minutes ago* (last edited 6 minutes ago) (2 children)

Are Russian factory workers building artillery shells for Russian soldiers not part of the war?
If they are, then why not also German factory workers building artillery shells for Ukrainian soldiers?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 minutes ago* (last edited 13 minutes ago)

Russia has declared war on Ukraine, therefore it is at war.

Germany had not declared war on anyone nor has anyone declared war on us, hence we are not at war.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 24 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

Russia is at war. Germany is not.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 hours ago

As would anyone with a working brain.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 hours ago

Comparing Yugoslavia to Ukraine is not a good comparison. The involvement in the Balkan war was an absolute disaster and the point where the Green party of Germany turned to shit. They didn't become advocates for defending yourself, they're not doing it for the sake of the countries that are being invaded or suffering from war crimes. They're doing it because they became outright transatlantic puppets.

[–] TheGrandNagus 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I wish the Greens in my country weren't so utterly useless and simping of Russia.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Be careful what you wish for, the German Greens ditched a good part of their climate policy, they even approved of strip mining away a whole village for brown coal.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

In 2023, when Putin shut down gas supply to Germany and Germany needed coal to preserve gas. Also the deal included half of Germanys brown coal power plants to be shut down by 2030, which was all the plants of the company strip mining. Also the village was bought out by the coal company years before the Greens gave the permit to have it demolished.

Just thought the context really matters in this case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

The additional coal from destroying that village wasn't needed for domestic energy supply but for energy export, AKA the coal company's profits. Just thought that the context matters in this case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

Mainly to France, which otherwise would have increased its gas consumption.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 41 minutes ago

And gas is still a lot cleaner than brown coal.

[–] TheGrandNagus 4 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

True, they are far from perfect.

But the Greens where I am are against things like building new solar/wind farms, and against infrastructure that connects this renewable energy stuff to the grid. They're against building any new houses.

They're just a NIMBY party cashing in on people thinking they're actually green.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The German Greens do have enough NIMBYs, too, who at times will happily confuse small localised protection of two stalks of grass with protection of the climate.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Is this well known German punctuality in the room with us right now?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 7 hours ago

No, it's still trying to get here with Deutsche Bahn.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

No, but the election season.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Are you talking to you self again?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] IndiBrony 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Wie geht's? Sind sie ok? 🫂

[–] TheBat 2 points 4 hours ago

Sie sind krank

[–] Valmond 6 points 7 hours ago

I wonder why we built all those weapons, is it for protection against the USA? China?

Can't be against Russia can it now?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Wow, that was not a headline I was expecting to see. The sentiment has shifted quite dramatically in the past two years.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

At least regarding Germany the truth is the Greens have been pushing for more weapons deliveries almost since the beginning of the war. It has been pretty clear that not delivering Taurus is because Scholz decided so.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They were also arguably the only major German party that took the Russian threat seriously before the war.

[–] BatrickPateman 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 55 minutes ago

And literally everyone else (besides the Left Party) is attacking him as their main opponent for that, despite the party being #4 in the polls at the moment and the Russian sleeper agents AfD+BSW are threatening to breach 1/3rd of the votes blocking any further changes of the constitution even if all democratic parties agree on it.

I really don't get why the CDU chose to attack the greens over the AfD and how they can seriously consider the scheming FDP as a possible coalition-option...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 6 hours ago

The Greens started out as a party of (among other things) the peace movement but quickly realised that vulgar pacifism is a) self-defeating and b) gets exploited by war mongers. In short, you gotta stand up to bullies. They very much backed the Kosovo intervention, and generally are in favour of talking softly but carrying a big stick. With friends, while singing Kumbaya, before aiming it at some genocidal maniac. In short scratch the hippie attitude now it's metal.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Really? The Greens are the most hawkish party in Germany, when it comes to Russia.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (3 children)

Among German parties, the Greens were the most skeptical of Russia for the past ~15 years. But until the war, they were never hawkish. Only days before the war started, foreign minister Baerbock (Greens) said Germany wouldn't deliver weapons. In late January 2022, the government then promised "5000 helmets" (although I think this may have had more to do with the chancellor than the Greens).

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 hours ago

I'd completely missed that. Seems Habeck was right yet again.

[–] lemmylommy 7 points 6 hours ago

Habeck wanted to deliver weapons before the war started.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It was more about the then minister of defence, that's why she was gone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Reading her Wikipedia entry, it sounds like she was dismissed for being too much of a Scholz loyalist. And that kind of matches my recollection: She was careful to discuss everything with Scholz and to not cross him, whereas her [suc]cessor just took matters in his own hands and ran with it.

According to a media report, in the discussion about the possible delivery of Leopard 2 tanks to Ukraine, which intensified at the end of 2022, she forbade her ministry from even recording its own stock of Leopard 2 and Leopard 1 tanks, as knowledge of deliverable stocks could potentially have put further pressure on Federal Chancellor Olaf Scholz. [DeepL, Wikipedia]


In der Ende 2022 sich verstärkenden Diskussion um die mögliche Lieferung von Leopard-2-Panzern an die Ukraine verbot sie nach einem Medienbericht ihrem Ministerium, den eigenen Bestand an den Panzern Leopard 2 und Leopard 1 überhaupt zu erfassen, da Kenntnis lieferbarer Bestände möglicherweise weiteren Druck auf den Bundeskanzler Olaf Scholz hätte aufbauen können.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

I remembered it wrong. She herself asked for being let go, officially because the constant discussions about her person made it impossible for her to do her job (her statement).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

TIL: The Green Party has been actively supporting Ukraine for quite some time. I was mostly just thinking of the general atmosphere of political discourse surrounding this topic. Remember that time when it wasn’t even clear that sending weapons is ok.