this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
251 points (98.8% liked)

Ukraine

8355 readers
882 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Putin is about to have a horrendous upcoming weeks.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Putin before Donald Trump enters the Oval Office.

[–] USNWoodwork 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looking at the distance, Ukraine would have to push North of Kursk to be able to hit Moscow. If they do that, I'd expect Putin to move to St. Petersburg for safety.

[–] Duamerthrax 3 points 1 month ago

That's what Cessnas are for.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

Haven’t seen me a 4koma in a while!

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Finally! Weaken Russia as much as possible before Trump gets in.

[–] Badeendje 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They should give Ukraine a tranche of tomahawks to really strike deep into Russia.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It would be something to see if the free world gives Ukraine frigates to strike from the Mediterranean and the Northern Pacific.

[–] Badeendje 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tomahawk has a land based launch system. And I'm fairly confident the Ukranians will rig it to something for initial delivery. Nesecity is the mother of invention

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pretty sure you can air launch them, too.

[–] Badeendje 1 points 1 month ago

The US uses b52s for that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

such dildo. very consequence.

[–] not_that_guy05 2 points 1 month ago

For a second I thought you wrote trebuchet with tomahawk's and I'm all for it.

[–] credo 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I believe NYT makes you login, even on a gift link. Here is a TLDR:

President Biden has authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike Russian and North Korean forces in Russia, a significant shift in U.S. policy. This decision comes in response to Russia’s introduction of North Korean troops into the conflict and their anticipated assault on Ukrainian forces in the Kursk region.

The move reflects growing concerns over Ukraine’s ability to withstand simultaneous assaults while defending territory. The authorization aims to bolster Ukraine’s defense, target high-value military assets, and deter North Korean involvement. However, it has sparked debate among U.S. officials over escalation risks, as Russia might retaliate against the U.S. or its allies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to reduce U.S. support for Ukraine, is set to take office in two months, adding urgency to the decision. The Ukrainian strategy may include using captured Russian territory in Kursk as leverage in potential future negotiations. Meanwhile, the risk of Russian countermeasures remains a central concern for Biden’s administration and its allies.

My take: I’ve been waiting on this since the US election. It’s sound strategy of we believe Putin won’t want to escalate with NATO before Trump takes office.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You just KNOW on day 1, trump is trying to pull out of NATO......again.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He'd be breaking a law passed by congress saying congress must approve it if he tried that.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

........and at what point do you think he gives a shit?

[–] NotMyOldRedditName 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, it had bipartisan senate support so I wouldn't immediately jump to the conclusion that the senate would agree.

If they don't approve it that'll cause a crisis and something will happen, whatever it may be.

Edit: Leaving NATO is a lot more serious than the corrupt stuff he does they don't bat an eye at.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

allows

This is exactly why the war is still going on. just say there are Hamas tunnels under the Kremlin already.

[–] Badeendje 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Hamas does not have the ability to destroy the planet several times over buddy. And a collapsed Russia we saw in the 90s it required scrambling to secure the nuclear weapons.. a lot of puckered up assholes during that period.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

[Not trying to argue] Your post has made me really wonder about that word, "secure," and how it might apply to the USA's nuclear weapons as well, soon or in time. Eegh.

[–] Badeendje 9 points 1 month ago

I think that's a valid point. If the US military is purged and restaffed based on loyalty to maga the only thing that stands between the world and annihilation at some point would be a person of conscience... Like what happened before in the USSR.

[–] Archer 2 points 4 weeks ago

We almost nuked North Carolina by accident and we’ve lost a few nukes. It’s not great

[–] Valmond 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We do need to take the toys from that psycopath though.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 month ago
[–] Badeendje 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I really hope that Russia found out about this change in policy as the atacms where already locked onto targets.. press release... Fire.

[–] phoneymouse 2 points 1 month ago

Aim at the Kremlin

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 weeks ago

ISW says that, unfortunately, this is only for limited strikes into Kursk. It's not a full carte blanche.

[–] Bookmeat 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Looking at you, Scholz...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They should have done this years ago, the gimps

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 weeks ago

Even Dr Doom agrees with me

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 weeks ago

Only Kursk though, so that sucks..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 weeks ago