this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
111 points (79.7% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7350 readers
496 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breakingcups 72 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

Ahah, that's relevant. Though the only difference this time will probably be Schumer having less facetime because the Democrats having vastly less power in Congress/the Senate. Nobody in the room is making any decision that would meaningfully worsen their conditions or those of anyone whose conditions they care about.

[–] NevermindNoMind 7 points 1 month ago

https://www.cnn.com/2017/09/13/politics/donald-trump-chuck-schumer-new-york/index.html

Correct, this was from a brief phase where Trump was trying on bipartisanship, and Schumer was trying to connect with him as a fellow New Yorker. I remember the talk at the time was Trump might go the way of Arnold Schwarzenegger when he was CA governor, tacking to the center and trying to become bipartisan to improve his approval ratings and mitigate midterm losses and ultimately set him up better for reelection. Obviously, it didn't work out like that, but there was a brief time where bipartisanship was on the table.

[–] UsernameHere 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'd like the context of photo please. I am not history-learned. Only spark-notes-of-history-acquainted.

[–] LePoisson 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm not sure of the origin of the photo but it's been around for some years now as a meme showing how media can be manipulative.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Ah I understand now. I filtered out the two photos on the side, figuring they were just an aesthetic choice.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

I'm too used to vertical videos having weird effects on the side to not make the screen look empty, that I completely missed the point of the pic.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

Always has been

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

And you're not invited

[–] Serinus 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Picture looks adversarial af. Caption: They're all friends.

Yeah, okay.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Trump's embracing Schumer here, I'd rate this 0% adversarial because I'm a sicko who's seen their body language/interactions which were well documented during the first Trump admin.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

Schumer has got a scolding finger up in the way of the attempted nonconsensual embrace.

[–] Serinus 1 points 1 month ago

I'm sure a certain narrative will be curated here.

[–] Kbobabob 1 points 1 month ago

during the first Trump admin.

Picture is from 2017

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] officermike 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)
  • Chuck Schumer (D-NY), Senate Majority Leader
  • Donald Trump (R-MAGAstan), former and future president
  • Not sure about baldy
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Baldy looks like it might be General John Kelly... Even though most pictures of him have some hair.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Man, Armagastan is such an accurate name for what America is these days.

It even eludes towards Armageddon, it's perfect.

[–] feedum_sneedson 2 points 1 month ago
[–] ChicoSuave 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Being cordial at work: ITS A CONSPIRACY

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

This is just your average liberal "democracy" where both the ruling parties work for their corporate backers. What seems like a "conspiracy" here?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

You didn't even try with that one. You ok, kiddo?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

It needs a big club. Right upside the heads

[–] SupahRevs 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Website doesn't exist or something.