this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
1023 points (92.2% liked)

Political Memes

5409 readers
6485 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Its only been 24hrs and this post aged like milk.

[–] Maganra 4 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Aged like fine wine my dude, ~14mill less dems showed up to vote

[–] TempermentalAnomaly 1 points 40 minutes ago

Do you think these people stayed home?

[–] AgentDalePoopster 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

And the fault for that lies squarely with Democrat politicians.

[–] freddydunningkruger 6 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago)

The fault lies squarely with people who make assinine claims without any evidence, pretending they hold some deep wisdom when they really don't know shit.

You are the evidence to support my claim, Poopster, in case that wasn't obvious.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 hours ago

Making wild leaps of interpretation and assumption is the only way Democrats have any points.

[–] bouh 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

And thus, instead of fighting the actual enemy, the republicans, you're antagonising the people who are more reasonable. Next time you can do it like France and call leftist crazy extremists so you'll seem less hypocritical about it.

[–] Moneo 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Been saying this the whole time. Libs were shaming and harassing undecided voters for weeks instead of acknowledging that the dems were running a god awful campaign and pivoting towards nazi policies.

[–] BlindFrog 1 points 36 minutes ago

Which policies are nazi-like?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You Americans are really weird in that regard. As a foreigner, both your parties are fucking horrible. To demonstrate what I mean: one party wants to ban abortions, the other party says that unless you vote for them, the bad guys will take away your abortions and then they proceed to do absolutely nothing about it.

So yeah, one of your parties is almost cartoonishly evil, the other is plain old adult-level evil.

It's not that democrats are any better than republicans, they're just smarter about pretending they're not evil.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 hours ago

This is not only incredibly reductionist, it's just flatout wrong. How can people still tout this "both parties are the same" bullshit?

It's gonna get real hard to keep it up in a few months when we start to see the real world implications of a second Trump regime.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Some of us are actually not Democrats or Republicans because we really think both sides are bad in different ways. I still voted though.

[–] rigatti 13 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

It's still worth it to register for one of the major parties to vote in their primary and push them towards your actual politics. For example, I wouldn't consider myself "a Democrat", but I am registered to the party and I vote as progressive as I can in primaries.

[–] Bruncvik 3 points 3 hours ago

From what I've read, the two times Trump won, many Democrats felt that they were denied this choice, which left them disillusioned, and they didn't vote. I don't think that's the main reason for Trump's victory, but what you touched on was definitely a factor in the Democrats' loss.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 hours ago

Not all states work the same. In Ohio I can just show up and tell them which one I want to vote in each time. I always vote in the Democrat or Republican primary, I get a voice without committing to one or the other.

[–] capital 12 points 18 hours ago

But then you don't get to brag about your enlightened centrism.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

And some of us who are that way understand that in FPTP there can only be a winner from one of the major parties and we are choosing who we want to fight to push for changes.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I always vote for who I perceive as the lesser evil of the two. This year is no different. I'm not excited about what either candidate wants to fight for. I will oppose whoever is elected on multiple fronts.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

The November elections are damage control. Unfortunately they always have been.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 day ago (9 children)

I think both Dems and Republicans suck in very different and not proportionate ways, but I am also a very big proponent of voting. Go vote! It's your duty.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I find that the thing people need to remember is that the general election is purely damage control time. For actual change, and getting candidates that don't suck, the work needs to already be done by the time the election rolls around.

[–] themeatbridge 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Politics is marketing. Governing is the slow boring of hard boards. You only get there with dilligence, conviction, and commitment to the idea that you are planting the trees that will shade your grandchildren.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil 15 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (3 children)

I find OP's post functionally defeatest. It hinges on this theory that there really is only one choice every election season. You must vote Democrat - whether it's Sherrod Brown or Eric Adams - and you can never question how these officials behave during an election season.

The Dems don't have any real duty towards their voters, or even an obligation to do a particularly good job of governing. They can just point at Republicans, say "Worse! Vote for us or that's who you get", then blast people with anxiety-inducing advertisement until folks panic.

The end result of this system is one in which Dems win by maximizing anxiety, rather than improving quality of life for anyone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

Which is why they lose. People literally tune them out. Unless they're morons like myself who keep trying to help the Democrats.see their nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

There are vastly larger numbers of choices in local and legislative races. And I encourage people to work hard to more variety in local and legislative races to push your values instead of only checking in every 4 years. The primary is the key time to push for who you want as the candidate.

During the actual election though, with FPTP, it unfortunately is that reductive. You are stuck choosing who is the lesser evil or who you want to push for change. The November presidential election is like public transportation. You may not like the conditions of the train or the exact destination the bus ends up at, but you take the bus that gets you closer to your destination.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

If third parties wanted to actually do some good in the country, you'd see them running locally and encouraging either ranked-choice voting or STAR voting (Score, then automatic runoff).

[–] billiam0202 18 points 1 day ago (8 children)

The fact that you only ever hear of third parties every four years really illustrates what their true objectives are.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] pjwestin 11 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Third parties run at all levels of government and they would actually benefit from eliminating first past the post polling far more than the major parties.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The bitter fact is that a winning candidate has no incentive to reform the voting system that put them in power.

Why would a dominant party want to give any competitor an advantage?

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I hate to say it, but the only way I could see it happen is if both parties simultaneously see significant 3rd/4th party challengers acting as spoilers. In that situation, RCV would be the short term solution to remove the effect of spoiler votes. Basically the situation the UK is in right now with both the Lib Dems and Reform.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

Because they care about maintaining their voters far more than enticing non-voters. If you listen to legislators and their staff for example, the way they perceive it is that non-voters may as well not exist in their minds, but eroding voters get attention.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I see no Green party members on the local ballot to enact this. They are starting at the top, which doesn't help.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The greens internal voting is literally done by RCV, they have it both in practice and in platform all the way down the line. AFAIK, so does the DSA.

But whatever dude, keep doing what you're doing, it's working out great, clearly!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago

Shhh, they need someone to blame for their horrible run.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

Yup, they know they’re outnumbered so they try every trick in the book to stop the Democrat bloc surplus from voting.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Looking to shut up those people complaining about both sides from the sidelines? Put them in the game by passing electoral reform in your state.

Since they seem to know it all, let them show us how it's done by replacing First-past-the-post voting, passing equal access and airtime laws, and switching away from a perpetual election cycle to something shorter and more reasonable.

Get them to prove to us they know how to do things by making third parties viable and doing away with the infamous spoiler effect that is inherent with FPTP voting.

More people involved in the poltical process, more people voting, more people voting = more democratic votes, more chances to defeat the republicans, more people to call out bullshit on the debate stage, no more canceled debates because of giant man babies.

Electoral reform is just win after win for the American people. I know the election season has people exhausted, but things don't have to be this way. We can be free.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

For anyone who already knows the truth of this meme, or who would like to know more about the vast methods of deception and how to spot and counter them, this DEFCON 32 talk is incredible.

DEF CON 32 - Counter Deception: Defending Yourself in a World Full of Lies - Tom Cross, Greg Conti

The Internet was supposed to give us access to the world's information, so that people, everywhere, would be able to know the truth. But that’s not how things worked out. Instead, we have a digital deception engine of global proportions. Nothing that comes through the screen can be trusted, and even the things that are technically true have been selected, massaged, and amplified in support of someone’s messaging strategy.

Deception isn’t just about narratives - we see deception at every layer of the network stack, from spoofed electromagnetic signatures, to false flags in malware, to phony personas used to access networks and spread influence. They hide in our blindspots, exploit our biases, and fill our egos while manipulating our perceptions.

How do we decide what is real? This talk examines time-tested maxims that teach the craft of effective deception, and then inverts those offensive principles to provide defensive strategies. We’ll explore ways to counter biases, triangulate information sources, detect narratives, and how hackers can build tools that can change the game.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

The destruction of the republican party via increased voter and representation rights represents the single greatest possible "progressive" leftward shift of the US political window. Emphasis on "possible". Conservatives are a minority party and their extreme views do not represent modern America.

The road to a more progressive, equitable future is through the democrats. It doesn't end there.

Republicans winning offices means more long lasting legislation to clear, more conservative judicial appointments, etc.

Teaching THIS (2024) democratic party a lesson is worthless if it comes with 30+ years of conservative judicial backsliding.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Find your polling location. Go vote!

Your ballot will be deciding much more than just the president. Even if you did theoretically think both presidential canidates were equal in all regards (they aren't), then vote for the down ballot races!

Keep your local school boards from having insane people on it that will ban books and harm your kids or your neighbors's.

Vote for the constitutional ammendment questions and ballot initiatives. For instance, many states have either pro and anti abortion questions on their ballot.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I voted, that should be enough, same as anyone.

Also, both sides are bad, in different ways.

load more comments
view more: next ›