this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
229 points (96.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

1922 readers
1225 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

for context, this is entirely incorrect.

xi is not "brilliant"(he was very lucky to become PM when he did), and he is losing control.

not just xinjiang, but many provinces of China have been separating themselves from Beijing and trying to declare independence for years.

xi obviously have no control over Taiwan, although they're trying to brute force the government.

Shanghai is very international and doesn't want to be associated with Beijing.

Hong Kong obviously doesn't consider itself as governed by Beijing.

and despite the constant violent dictator tactics, China has persistent protests in every province by brave Chinese citizens standing up and calling out the human rights abuses, the broken economic promises, the countless domestic and foreign political failures of China, the insane quarantine measures taken fruitlessly being a good recent example, the complete collapse of their housing market after the government encouraged everyone to invest all of their life savings in real estate being another.

xi's "iron fist" is gripping sand, and it is falling through his fingers.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean you say that but Hong Kong got it pretty hard.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

HK is still being invaded, and everything I wrote above is still correct.

HK citizens are still resisting, they have almost daily protests and resistance actions; xi is in no way ruling with an iron fist.

he is actively losing his grip.

[–] savx 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

can you elaborate on "daily protests"? i feel like things are pretty calm now after national security law passed.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago

Thats the thing about ruling with an iron fist. It works for a short time, but the ones oppressed are just looking for any reason to create your downfall. And there are a lot of oppressed people right now.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Once again saying the quiet part out loud

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How many times does he have to say "the quiet part" before it's not quiet? He called himself a "day one dictator" and promised that this will be the last vote his supporters will need to do. There is no subtle dog whistles anymore, just a campgain strategy of promising to end democracy.

[–] Zirconium 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yea but the Democrats are gonna destroy democracy and America. He's just going to destroy democracy but save america and make it great again (whichever time period before civil rights that is)

[–] horse_battery_staple 29 points 2 weeks ago

I truly think this rhetoric from Trump is what's emboldening DPRK and PRC and Russia and Israel to escalate the way they have been. Because if Trump becomes president they can just do whatever the fuck they want to.

[–] cultsuperstar 7 points 2 weeks ago

I still remember when Xi made himself president for life and Trump said at a rally, "maybe we oughtta try that some day."

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 7 points 2 weeks ago

Lol Xi is just uncomfortable and looking to be away from him ASAP.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 1 points 2 weeks ago

I never thought I'd miss Deng Xiaoping

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Once again, I'll wait here patiently while literally nobody shows up here to rail against Trump for supporting genocide.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

what are you talking about?

The first comment is condemning him and the second comment explicitly mentions that he shouldn't be supporting genocide.

both comments happen before yours