this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024

162 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39447 readers

2287 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

162

Pope Francis' Catholic church reform process ends without giving more equity to women (apnews.com)

submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave to c/world

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Limonene 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If anyone was hoping for women priests, give up on that. The Roman Catholic church would first have to retract both papal infallibility and ecumenical infallibility.

They have made too many definitive statements that women can't be priests, and they have made definitive statements that their definitive statements are infallible, and must be agreed to by anyone who calls themself Catholic. It's not even up for debate (unless all of the infallibility stuff is also up for debate).

For example:

I declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church's faithful.

https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/apost_letters/1994/documents/hf_jp-ii_apl_19940522_ordinatio-sacerdotalis.html

They really painted themselves into a corner. While the rest of society moves forward with equal rights for historically marginalized groups, the Catholic church will be stuck with the effects of their early bad decisions (and some recent bad decisions) because they banned themselves from admitting when they are wrong.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Eh they could do whatever they want. They could declare that "the point in time has been reached that god wanted women to be able to be priests from. His plan has always been that women were not allowed to be priests until a certain date had passed, and now that date has arrived."

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When protestants started the logical stance that the bread and wine is a metaphor being used in the Eucharist, Catholics stayed with saying it is a ritual that transformed the bread and wine to having christs blood and body imbued into them, like an act of magic performed with superhuman abilities, not people just worshipping him. If they would choose to say cannibalism is terrible, except when we do it, I cant see the stubbornness lapsing when it came to say women can suddenly perform magic after a certain date. But who knows, crazier things have happened in life.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

When protestants started the logical stance that the bread and wine is a metaphor being used in the Eucharist,

That's never been the Lutheran position, at least for all I know. The Lutheran position is "whatever happens, happens, regardless of what you think it is that happens": If someone is saying "This is my flesh, this is my blood" while handing out suitable food and drink and the giver and the recipients are in the mood to receive the sacrament, then it is the sacrament, no matter what metaphysics anyone involved believes in.

I cant see the stubbornness lapsing when it came to say women can suddenly perform magic

Oh but there's the priesthood of all believers, even the Catholics accept that as doctrine. It's not about whether or not women, or laypeople, can or cannot perform the magic, it's whether they should be doing it in the church, for a congregation. I'm pretty sure there's women cloisters where women are doing the magic. The Lutheran church, too, restricts the incantation of the magic words to the reverend, but that's a church rule. Like, "If it was on the schedule and the reverend is sick in bed the cantor isn't going to jump in we'll do it at another date".

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, the Lutherans were the first split from Catholicism and sort of what I would say would be the start of protestantism. Not that Martin Luther initially wanted that, but he wanted a return to basics and a simpler less controlling version of what the church had slowly become. (95? Thesis and what not.. maybe it was 99 can't recall)

Now we have thousands of denominations of Christians, and they all do their own versions of how they believe things should be. Haven't studied the historys of religion in a long time, it's crazy to think about how much I'm sure things have changed and I've distorted in my brain throughout time when I reflect on the fact that it has been more than 15 years since the last real class I would have taken. Getting older is strange.

Some day it'd be nice to start studying history more again.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

I mean, a lot of people already hate the dude. There are catholics out there who already refuse to call him the pope.

Now imaginenig he just came out one day and said, yeah everything the previous pope's said may have been wrong. But I know what ir right so now listen to me.

Won't go down well

[+] Vendul 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In Germany church taxes you.

[+] Vendul 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is "compensations" paid to the church from the general tax pool. Also church run hospitals, daycars and schools are still largely financed through public money, while their employees have less rights because of church law. Oh and the bishops are also paid by the government directly.

Unless you dont pay any tax in Germany you also pay taxes to run the churches. The church tax comes on top of that.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If you're religious, you pay tax. If you're not, you can opt out. https://www.welcome-hub-germany.com/blog/church-tax-germany

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but you opting out does not remove the fact that from the normal tax pool money also goes directly to running the churches. In other words as long as you pay any taxes, you also pay to the church.

It is considered "compensations" for Napoleons disowning the churches.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Quoth Article 138 WRV, part of the Basic Law of Germany:

(1) Rights of religious societies to public subsidies on the basis of a law, contract or special grant shall be redeemed by legislation of the Länder. The principles governing such redemption shall be established by the Reich.

Just so we're clear: "redeemed" here means "gotten rid of". It's been on the books since 1919, so far the Reich, now the Bund, has failed to pass the required guideline laws for the states to do it. Back in the days redeemed would've meant "we'll give you a lump sum one-off, in exchange, we'll stop paying regularly", now, after all those years, it arguably should be "you'll get nothing from now on also you still owe us".

There's been movement, though. There's been uppity municipalities having a look at those age-old contracts, who noticed that they said nothing about money that aspect was agreed upon, unofficially, sometime later so they went ahead and dumped what the local reverend was entitled to on their driveway: Something like three steres of wood, ten sacks of rye and five of wheat, a hundredweight of onions, a tub of salted butter, two kegs of beer, as well as some length of linen and some of melton.

[–] Diplomjodler3 2 points 2 months ago

Not me.

[–] Granite 6 points 2 months ago

Lack of equality is why I left the church in my youth. I have way more reasons to never rejoin now, but this feels way too little way too late.

[–] fluxion 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

That's a Hell of a background they decided on for that photo

[–] Subtracty 4 points 2 months ago

https://publicdelivery.org/fazzini-resurrection/ massive intimidating sculpture that the pope sits in front of when he meets with people

[–] NOT_RICK 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jesus out there lookin like a C’tan shard

[–] Erasmus 2 points 2 months ago

Was just thinking - why does the Catholic Church have one of the C’tan captured - but then again that would probably explain a whole lot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

It looks like something out of Dark Souls

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 2 months ago

How fun. I was just talking to my daughter about how incredibly sexist the Catholic Church is yesterday.

She said that someone she was talking to online excused the 'women must not speak in church' part of the New Testament as saying that makes nuns possible. So since she knows basically nothing about Catholicism, I explained to her the major power imbalance between priests and nuns and how the patriarchal structure of the Catholic Church will keep it that way for the foreseeable future.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -3 points 2 months ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for Associated Press:

Wiki: reliable - The Associated Press is a news agency. There is consensus that the Associated Press is generally reliable. Syndicated reports from the Associated Press that are published in other sources are also considered generally reliable.

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America

Search topics on Ground.News

https://apnews.com/article/vatican-reforms-women-equity-ordination-synod-francis-5cdd62a4d191b77ec71b30440c59e75e

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support