this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
51 points (96.4% liked)

Politics Without Trolls

72 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dance_ninja 17 points 3 months ago

Oh thank God there's a new picture of her.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Does the term "conflict of interest" even have meaning anymore?

[–] halcyoncmdr 4 points 3 months ago

The Judiciary branch of government has historically been pretty consistent with maintaining at least appearances even with political bias. Judges usually recuse themselves when there are glaringly obvious conflicts. The mechanisms to enforce it are weak or non-existent depending on the level up the chain.

Blatantly ignoring ethics and obvious massive political bias are pretty new. They usually at least Tried to keep up appearances.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 3 points 3 months ago

aaaaaaaaaaaaaAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAIIIIIIIGH!!

FUCK!