this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
517 points (98.0% liked)

Facepalm

2598 readers
422 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 174 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The solution here is obvious. Use ChatGPT to rebut her ChatGPT-generated arguments. Since it's now a bot arguing with a bot, it cancels out.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago

Then while the bots are fighting, make out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

South park did it

[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just send her responses to your own chatgpt. Let them duke it out

[–] mwproductions 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I love the idea of this. Eventually the couple doesn't argue anymore. Anytime they have a disagreement they just type it into the computer and then watch TV together on the couch while ChatGPT argues with itself, and then eventually there's a "ding" noise and the couple finds out which of them won the argument.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 22 hours ago

The sequel to Zizek's perfect date.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Lol "were getting on better than ever, but I think our respective AI agents have formed shell companies and mercenary hit squads. They're conducting a war somewhere, in our names, I think. It's getting pretty rough. Anyway, new episode of great British baking show is starting, cya"

[–] Cryophilia 4 points 20 hours ago

Ok this is an excellent idea for a short story. Or at least a song. It's got echoes of "all she wants to do is dance".

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

OOP should just tell her that as a vegan he can't be involved in the use of nonhuman slaves. Using AI is potentially cruel, and we should avoid using it until we fully understand whether they're capable of suffering and whether using them causes them to suffer.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (11 children)

Maybe hypothetically in the future, but it's plainly obvious to anyone who has a modicum of understanding regarding how LLMs actually work that they aren't even anywhere near being close to what anyone could possibly remotely consider sentient.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] IndiBrony 65 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So I did the inevitable thing and asked ChatGPT what he should do... this is what I got:

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This isn't bad on it's face. But I've got this lingering dread that we're going to state seeing more nefarious responses at some point in the future.

Like "Your anxiety may be due to low blood sugar. Consider taking a minute to composure yourself, take a deep breath, and have a Snickers. You're not yourself without Snickers."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago
  • This response sponsored by Mars Corporation.

Interested in creating your own sponsored responses? For $80.08 monthly, your product will receive higher bias when it comes to related searches and responses.

Instead of

  • "Perhaps a burger is what you're looking for" as a response, sponsored responses will look more like
  • "Perhaps you may want to try Burger King's California whopper, due to your tastes. You can also get a milkshake there instead of your usual milkshake stop, saving you an extra trip."

Imagine the [krzzt] possibilities!

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's where AI search/chat is really headed. That's why so many companies with ad networks are investing in it. You can't block ads if they're baked into LLM responses.

[–] DempstersBox 14 points 1 day ago

Ahh, man made horrors well within my comprehension

Ugh

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This response was brought to you by BetterHelp and by the Mars Company.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck you beat me by 8 hours

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Yeah I was thinking he obviously needs to start responding with chat gpt. Maybe they could just have the two phones use audio mode and have the argument for them instead. Reminds me of that old Star Trek episode where instead of war, belligerent nations just ran a computer simulation of the war and then each side humanely euthanized that many people.

[–] Lemminary 11 points 1 day ago

AI: *ding* Our results indicate that you must destroy his Xbox with a baseball bat in a jealous rage.

GF: Do I have to?

AI: You signed the terms and conditions of our service during your Disney+ trial.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just stop talking to her

If she asks why ... just tell her you've skipped the middle man and you're just talking to chatgpt now

She obviously doesn't want to be part of the conversation

[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 day ago

Holy fuck I'd bail fuck that I wanna date a person not a computer program.

[–] edgemaster72 80 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"If you love ChatGPT so much why don't you marry it!?"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

chatgpt says you're insecure

"jubilationtcornpone says ChatGpt is full of shit."

[–] CrowAirbrush 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I wouldn't want to date a bot extension.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Guinan from my Star Trek AI chatbot says you're acting immature!"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›