this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
81 points (88.6% liked)

Technology

58293 readers
4796 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It feels like every few months there's a new tech "revolution" being hyped up as the future. Besides AI, what’s the most overhyped trend in tech right now? For me, it’s the constant buzz around the metaverse.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd 31 points 6 days ago

There's a buzz around the metaverse? Hell, even Meta has cancelled their meta project.

[–] eronth 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Both the love for Generative AI/LLM is overhyped, but so is the hate for it. They're actually pretty good tools, they won't save the world on their own in their current state.

[–] Kampfkrapfen_Backup 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Thank you! They get trashed on all occasions here in the fediverse and I get the animosity since every corp and their mother now wants to ride the hype train. But I've kinda changed my mind about AI since having been recommended two AI tools that actually cite sources for their answers (Elicit and Perplexity). They're an absolute godsend for the literature search on my Bachelor's Thesis

[–] assassinatedbyCIA 4 points 5 days ago

Here’s how I see it. Gen AI and LLMs are really good for things that I won’t pay money for. It’s undoubtedly impressive tech, but it really deserves to remain as a cool research project rather than an actual functional product.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Mobile apps. They have so much money and users and it still feels like there isn't as many cool mobile apps as there are cool computer program.

Mobile apps often feel like a web browser with the URL bar.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It’s totally possible to make cool mobile apps, but most of the ones you see are just a big company porting their website.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I know but I expected there to be more cool apps and less shit ones. I'm disappointed by what mobiles have become.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreliac 20 points 6 days ago (5 children)

5G, all phone carriers in my country promises gigabit speeds but in my tests results shows slower speeds than current 4G and coverage is worse

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

Not apologizing for carriers, some are really on the edge of lying to consumers, but you have to separate the 2 parts that make 5G different from 4G.

  1. Higher frequencies: means higher throughput but also shorter range (you can literally block that signal with your hand). Only works if your phone supports these higher frequency bands, you have to be in areas where the carrier has deployed cells supporting those, and you have to be close enough.
  2. Increased efficiency: mostly affects carriers, you likely won't notice the difference. Basically means, areas that were congested before with LTE will now see less congestion.

I found most 5G ads infuriating. If you know the tech, you understand whats going on and how they aren't telling the complete story. If you don't know the tech, you'll think, "Yay, higher speeds." Nope...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

From what I understand, 5G was first about increased capacity. Increased speed was a secondary point. It optimizes how multiple users can share the same bands, and adds use of higher frequency bands that don't propogate as far. So for very high congestion areas, they can deploy smaller cells and which each can maintain higher speeds per user. I think the "faster" part was just marketing to get users to buy into the new technology. I mean I think that was the intent. Something about the implementation needs tuning though.

[–] nutsack 4 points 6 days ago

that technology doesn't even make sense

[–] luves2spooge 2 points 5 days ago

Works great here with almost 100% coverage

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

It ain't just your country... 5g speeds marketing was total bullshit.

So if that was the lie... Why did they shill it so hard?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Passkeys. They'll probably improve eventually but I feel like right now it's a mess.

On Android you are forced to use the default implementation, only in 14 and above can you use password managers for them.

On desktop it's somewhat less messy but you can use the system storage or a password manager extension. Some sites only let you use them for 2FA, some full login, some can't be put in a password manager from my experience and so on.

Just a mess right now.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

I am mostly concerned about potentially needing specific Big Tech implementations for them in some way... I don't mind using, say, KeepassXC for it, because it is independent from any account or hardware, as well as easily backupable. But NOT anything tied to a Google or MS account.

Maybe I am misunderstanding something, but Paypal says it restricts what passkeys can be used, so it is apparently possible:

Passkeys are currently available for eligible personal accounts. An eligible Apple or Android device is required to create a passkey.

[–] meliante 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Electric cars and bigger vehicles. The electricity storage tech is just not there yet. However, I think it's perfectly suitable for personal transportation like scooters and bikes.

[–] Joelk111 2 points 5 days ago

My electric skateboard still blows my mind. It's crazy how well it works as compared to gasoline skateboards.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

For me, the sweet spot is in plug in hybrids, as long as you actually, you know, plug them in. You can cover all your daily commute and grocery getting 100% electric and then if you need to take a longer trip occasionally, you're covered by the gasoline engine. We use like one tank of gas every 4 months on ours.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

For me, it’s the constant buzz around the metaverse.

What in the world is the "metaverse"? Are you referring to the thing "Meta" tries to call virtual reality?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Arm on Laptops and Desktops

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd disagree but first I want to hear your opinion on riscv

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

RiscV is a fundamentally different story then Arm, currently speaking RiscV is not there yet however I have more hope in the future of RiscV then Arm. Both hardware and software side RiscV is not ready however the idea of a fully open source computer still excites me. I understand however that I may be speaking more out of idealism and im certainly biased however I still hope that RiscV overtakes Arm.

[–] bokherif 7 points 6 days ago (5 children)

Well arm cpu’s get you insane battery life (ie. Macbook M series or new snapdragons). The architecture has not settled in yet but it will take some time

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

Wtf is an "arm" in this context?

Edit: downvoting someone for asking a question is super cool, apparently.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

The Arm architecture (Arm_64) which powers Apple and Snapdragon in comparison to AMD_64 (x86_64) which powers Intel and AMD (Intel created x86 and AMD created x86_64)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Your question is reasonable, most people are not aware of CPU architectures

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›