this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
166 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19098 readers
3529 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Additionally, note how it’s Trump’s own Jay Sekulow that is representing them.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would the Democratic Party do this to poor Jill Stein?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right? She only ever wanted to be a Russian asset that helped Trump win. How dare they!?

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 11 points 1 month ago

She just wants to make her daddy Putin proud.

[–] elbucho 13 points 1 month ago

This really is quite pathetic when you think about it. The primary duty of a political party is to get their candidate on the ballot in all 50 states. Fuckery in Nevada aside, the Green Party has only managed to get Stein on the ballot in 38 states. Like, it'd be one thing if they managed to get her on the ballot in all 49 other states and just got screwed in NV, but they completely failed to do their job in 11 other states besides Nevada. And when it comes down to it, the problem in NV is that they filed incorrect paperwork. Any organization that was on the ball would be triple checking everything to make sure that their primary job (get the candidate on the ballot) was done right.

Shit like this is why I can never take the Green party seriously. How do you expect to win the presidency if the residents from a quarter of the states in the Union don't even have an option to vote for you? And if the party can't even get their primary job done correctly, how can they even expect to attract good candidates?

[–] just_another_person 8 points 1 month ago

🥳🍾🎆🎇🍻🎉🎊🎶🥂🪅

[–] Rapidcreek 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On the plus side, I now know about a Scout's cruise control.

https://youtu.be/3N-B0_OKkeg?feature=shared

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

He’s such a class act.

[–] reddig33 3 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Trump’s own Jay Sekulow that is representing them.

Suddenly I understand why they lost. They should have gone with a legal team that actually knows what it is doing if they wanted to win the suit instead of winning publicity.