this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
291 points (99.3% liked)

News

23311 readers
4217 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge has partially sided with the family of a Black man who was fatally shot by a now-imprisoned white Kansas City, Missouri, police detective, ruling that the officer should not have entered the man’s backyard.

U.S. District Judge Beth Phillips ruled Wednesday that Eric DeValkenaere violated 26-year-old Cameron Lamb’s Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure by entering his property in 2019 without a warrant or other legal reason to be there.

However, Phillips declined to issue a summary judgment on the family’s claim that the ensuing shooting amounted to excessive force, and made no immediate decision on any damages in the wrongful death case filed against the Kansas City police board and DeValkenaere.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 month ago

As always, ACAB.

[–] bappity 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they haven't ruled on the other parts yet

[–] gdog05 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And that's where things usually break down. Where nothing of reasonable consequence will happen to an officer/murderer. The fact that this part is news. When a judge rules against a police officer's conduct when blatantly in the wrong (and that happens all the goddamn time)... Well that just speaks volumes.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

correct me if I'm wrong, but this is in reference to a civil suit. the ruling has nothing to do with him being locked up

[–] gdog05 9 points 1 month ago

You are absolutely right. I couldn't get the article to load and found another one. I'm totally wrong.

[–] Badeendje 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

More likely this is the judge signalling to the city they better get a deal on the table the family can/will accept or it might happen and set a precedent.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

There's no need for any new case law here. It's already established that the cops can't go into a fenced off yard unless they have a warrant or accident circumstances, which they didn't. No precedents are going to be set, because they already were, long ago.

I believe that the victim filed a civil rights lawsuit with multiple claims, and this one claim was so obvious that the judge ruled there's no need for a jury to rule on it, but that the other claims would have to go before a jury.

This means the city is going to lose on at least one aspect of the case, and they could choose to fight the other aspects of it in court, or they could settle, as you suggested.

[–] ripcord 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Phillips, who relied heavily on evidence presented in the criminal case, noted that Lamb kicked over a barricade to get into the backyard and had no legal reason to be there.

I'm confused. Lamb kicked over a barricade to get into his own backyard, and had no legal reason to be there? The backyard that the title says the cops shot him in and that was his...?

Edit: OK, read a better article, this should say DeValkenaere. Which is what I figured, but wtf AP?