this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
515 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19142 readers
3505 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snausagesinablanket 61 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Apathy is dangerous. Concerted and continued vocal distaste and increasing the visibility of these plans is the best way to respond if you disagree rather than muted apathy and sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not a big movie fan, are you?

[–] disguy_ovahea 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I am Jack's inflamed sense of rejection.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I am Jack’s comprehension of subtext.

[–] Myxomatosis 49 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Where is the conservative outrage over this plan to increase taxes?

[–] Viking_Hippie 31 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Same place as it was when they last did the same thing: the Realms of Republican Denial. RRD is a very crowded place.

[–] Sludgehammer 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Captain_Buddha 10 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 months ago

It's almost as if that's all Republicans ever want to do. Go figure.

[–] BetaBlake 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Republicans - "dictate me harder daddy"

[–] rayyy 9 points 2 months ago

Weak people crave authoritarian leadership but authoritarians are usually weak too.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Surprisedpikachu.jpg

[–] bagelberger 8 points 2 months ago

Got my second mailing from the GOP attempting to separate Trump from Project 2025. They're scared, and spending a lot of money because of it

[–] cultsuperstar 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And his dumb supporters are still for it. Like they'll put up with higher taxes for them and less taxes for the rich as long as women and LGBTQ+ and probably whatever minorities are listed don't have the same rights as them. They're willing to pay the Project 2025 tax.