this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
209 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19077 readers
5989 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Luna, a self-described 32-year-old “MAGA Trump supporter” from the battleground state of Wisconsin, has gained a huge following since she joined X, formerly Twitter, in March. Her timeline has become a digital bullhorn for the “Make America Great Again” movement, praising former President Donald Trump’s re-election bid, promoting conspiracy theories about his opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, and touting Republican talking points to nearly 30,000 followers, who she addresses as “patriots.”

“Would You Support Trump Being The President forever? I wonder if you all support Trump for president just like me,” @Luna_2K24 posted on July 29, sharing a beach selfie in a white bikini and asking her followers to respond with an American flag emoji if they agreed. The post was viewed by around 54,000 people.

But Luna isn’t real. The photos of the smiling brunette posted periodically on @Luna_2K24’s timeline are of Debbie Nederlof, a German fashion influencer who lives across the Atlantic and won’t be voting in the US presidential election in November. When CNN reached out to the 32-year-old, a trained optician and single mother who is working two jobs – as a social media manager at an engineering firm and as a model to raise money for her child – she was angry and frustrated that her face was being used to push pro-Trump propaganda on X.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 70 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Is Elon trying to speedrun getting X shut down in the EU?

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I hope they get wrecked and the company gets imploded

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

If you saw the investor list that was posted a week or so ago on various sites and linked from a bunch of posts all over the fediverse, a significant fraction (perhaps a financial majority - not sure) kinda obviously have primary goals that do not really demand profit at all (I.e. they bought in to have a stake in one of the biggest social networks in existence, and use their stake to make demands on the implementers and maintainers of said network).

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

I hope Elon gets wrecked by something blunt like a spoon or a wrecking ball.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

for a while now he's sabotaging it before the US elections, to help his fascist friends

[–] JustZ 52 points 2 months ago

Once again the self proclaimed "silent majority" turns out to be a rich person paying for the appearance of popularity.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I hope everyone this happens to sues and they go after both X and Musk personally for gross negligence.

[–] reddig33 9 points 2 months ago

Neither ever pays their bill.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

MAGA being Sleazy and weird no surprise there.

[–] Delusional 2 points 2 months ago

It's their default state. I'd be more surprised if they acted with dignity and responsibility for once.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's the usual suspects. More proof that tech isn't inherently good or bad, it's just bad people that use tech to amplify their awfulness.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Weird shit.