this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
4 points (83.3% liked)

Political Discussion and Commentary

242 readers
22 users here now

A place to discuss politics and offer political commentary. Self posts are preferred, but links to current events and news are allowed. Opinion pieces are welcome on a case by case basis, and discussion of and disagreement about issues is encouraged!

The intent is for this community to be an area for open & respectful discussion on current political issues, news & events, and that means we all have a responsibility to be open, honest, and sincere. We place as much emphasis on good content as good behavior, but the latter is more important if we want to ensure this community remains healthy and vibrant.

Content Rules:

  1. Self posts preferred.
  2. Opinion pieces and editorials are allowed on a case by case basis.
  3. No spam or self promotion.
  4. Do not post grievances about other communities or their moderators.

Commentary Rules

  1. Don’t be a jerk or do anything to prevent honest discussion.
  2. Stay on topic.
  3. Don’t criticize the person, criticize the argument.
  4. Provide credible sources whenever possible.
  5. Report bad behavior, please don’t retaliate. Reciprocal bad behavior will reflect poorly on both parties.
  6. Seek rule enforcement clarification via private message, not in comment threads.
  7. Abide by Lemmy's terms of service (attacks on other users, privacy, discrimination, etc).

Please try to up/downvote based on contribution to discussion, not on whether you agree or disagree with the commenter.

Partnered Communities:

Politics

Science

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Rein in the insurance bullshit.

Set price caps for everything, make insurers have to default to approval, and need to apply for the ability to deny.

Mandate a breakup of medical conglomerates to relocalize hospitals. Nothing bigger than state level, just as an arbitrary division.

but back that up with taxation on net worth over ten mil. Drain the fucking coffers of the vampires of finance.

[–] laverabe 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

I know most people would prefer single payer / medicare for all (as would I honestly), but assuming that democrats don't go down that road in the next 4 years, what would you like healthcare in the US to look like in the short term?

[–] rowinxavier 3 points 3 months ago

In Australia we have a single payer with private alongside. It is not good to have the private alongside but it is definitely a good step.

To make it happen in the USA I would hope for a government system to cover people who are currently not or poorly covered, so basically a below bronze tier plan, that is funded through a specific levy on something disconnected from healthcare, say corporate profits or very high income. Cover just the lowest of the low at first, the people who currently get nothing, and then gradually expand it, eating into the low end of the market. Every year bring more people over, eventually bringing everyone over and outlawing private.

As for how to actually manage the healthcare itself, I think it would make sense for government hospitals to be run by the government and for everyone there to be on a salary which is reasonable and provides stability. Maybe have a specific tax incentive for new doctors/nurses/other professionals to do a number of years, say 5-10, for a significant reduction in their university costs. Make sure that the entire system is aimed at long term impacts on health so dentistry should be included, perinatal, early childhood, and so on. Always be looking to prevent health issues rather than treat. Aim for quality of life enhancement as much as possible.

Once you have a base system started you can also branch out a little, adding linkages to schooling for the dietetics and exercise physiology stuff, aged care facilities for geriatric and cognitive health stuff, and so on. Make sure that alongside all of this you properly fund and support the independent operation of Native American healthcare and try as much as possible to have a system meeting people where they are with members of that community, so try to encourage underrepresented people into medicine and support their educational attainment.

As for the state by state thing, ditch it. This is not different based on which side of a line you are, it is different based on the medical needs of every person in every community. Some areas will need more support for drug and alcohol induced issues, but honestly they are needed everywhere so just make that available everywhere. Same with geriatric care, there are old people everywhere. Oklahoma does not have different humans to California, just different laws and different contexts, but making sure that each individual gets the care they need is the central rule.

Lastly, use this as an opportunity to roll out an eHealth record system. Make it national, ideally make it interoperable with Europe, and make it very secure. By secure I don't mean ask Microsoft for help, I mean have the NSA and so on run red team ops on it, trying to get in, for the life of the system, then fix holes they find. Make sure people own their own data and can access every report and record from their portal. And also do thorough consulting on delegation of access, sometimes your partner having access to your records is a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The first possibly doable thing, would be adding a public option to the the ACA marketplaces. I don't know who would manage it. Medicare maybe.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear 2 points 3 months ago

I wonder if it would be possible for the government to start their own nonprofit insurance company that competes with corporate insurance companies. I'm envisioning it working a bit like how USPS works compared to FedEx of UPS. Good for the basics and it keeps prices down through competition.