this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2024
25 points (83.8% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4992 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I like the idea of it. My only input on this would be:

If it's meant for discussions, maybe make it for self posts only? Or at least link to opinion pieces instead of just any articles? Otherwise, what's the difference this compared to the political news communities?

[–] laverabe 7 points 2 months ago

I guess my idea was a somewhat unregulated version of /politics , with far less "approved sources", and more discussion and non media news outlet narratives. Basically I liked what that former site's /r/politics community was before 2015 when people could post anything, editorize within reason. It could be a self post, a link, discussion, etc.

I don't really want to 'limit' what people submit, but that might change if people think it's not working out well.

I mean look at Lemmy circa June of last year. All of the people who fled 'that former site' to come here said this place felt like an old version of the internet, like 1990s forums/usenet. I was just going for that sort of community, and hopefully people willingly follow the rules.

I like the opinion piece idea though, I'll add that to the sidebar.

[–] laverabe 8 points 2 months ago

I'm not sure if this is allowed but I just wanted to put the updated address here: [email protected] . I changed the name from what it was originally as this seemed like a better description.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thats like hexbear with extra steps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

So lw will immediately defederate?

[–] laverabe 3 points 2 months ago

[email protected] is the link for anyone who is interested.

[–] btaf45 3 points 2 months ago

sounds good

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

But seriously, there is no need for arbitrary post limitations. Lemmy users are perfectly able to up-vote and down-vote content. I say allow users to post Fox News.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -4 points 2 months ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support