this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
1190 points (97.6% liked)

memes

10285 readers
2512 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus 139 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Explanation: The Romans used lead-lined cookware not in ignorance of its dangers, but wholly cognizant of them - the Romans recognized lead poisoning from various sources, and regarded lead as 'unwholesome' to human health.

They used lead widely in many applications that they could be forgiven for thinking were not dangerous - they understood how to prevent lead leaching in pipes, and used lead in writing tablets. Less forgivably, in cosmetics. But most dangerous of all was the use of lead pots in making 'defrutum' - sweet wine ~~jelly~~ syrup, which wealthy Romans loved to put on everything. The thing is, the process uses lead specifically because other materials won't do - copper and iron leave an aftertaste, while lead vessels actually make it sweeter, as lead ~~itself~~ acetate is slightly sweet.

What's a little harmless poison in your condiments, after all?

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 months ago (4 children)

The explanation is practically perfect, so focusing on two small tidbits:

Defrutum is not a jelly, it's more like a syrup: grape juice reduced to a half of its volume, to concentrate flavours and as a preservation method. I'm almost sure that it was available for a wide range of people, not just wealthy ones.

(It's also easy to prepare at home. And as long as you do it in a normal cooking pot it's completely safe. Great to use over vanilla ice cream.)

Lead itself isn't sweet; lead acetate is. There's a bit of acetic acid even in grape juice, and as you boil it in the lead container both things react together.

[–] PugJesus 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Defrutum is not a jelly, it’s more like a syrup: grape juice reduced to a half of its volume, to concentrate flavours and as a preservation method. I’m almost sure that it was available for a wide range of people, not just wealthy ones.

I've seen it referred to by various terms and I'm not culinarily educated enough to tell the difference between any of the words. Syrup, jelly, must; it's all Greek to me! I'll fix it in my explanation though!

It was available to a wide range of people, but it was a frequent visitor primarily to the tables of the wealthy.

Lead itself isn’t sweet; lead acetate is. There’s a bit of acetic acid even in grape juice, and as you boil it in the lead container both things react together.

I'll correct that too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago

Details and extra information like this are why I come to these topics.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

TIL Romans knew leads are bad ...

[–] PugJesus 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep!

"Water conducted through earthen pipes is more wholesome than that through lead; indeed that conveyed in lead must be injurious, because from it white lead [PbCO3, lead carbonate] is obtained, and this is said to be injurious to the human system. Hence, if what is generated from it is pernicious, there can be no doubt that itself cannot be a wholesome body. This may be verified by observing the workers in lead, who are of a pallid colour; for in casting lead, the fumes from it fixing on the different members, and daily burning them, destroy the vigour of the blood; water should therefore on no account be conducted in leaden pipes if we are desirous that it should be wholesome."

  • the Roman engineer Vitruvius, in De Architectura, written between 30 BCE-20 BCE
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That's honestly just kind of sad. Knowing the problem but ignoring it for the convenience afforded. Human nature at its finest.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

In two thousand years,while we have grown immensely as a species, in some ways we really haven't changed, making this meme painstakingly appropriate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

'Defrutum' is exactly what I would name an alcoholic fruit syrup if I was a drunk Roman.

[–] jaybone 14 points 2 months ago

I would have gone with “IV Loco”

[–] FireRetardant 70 points 2 months ago (4 children)

We also put lead in gasoline knowing damn well it would come out the tail pipes and people on the streets would have to breathe it. Several decades of leaded gasoline passed until someone developed an alternative to fix engine knocks. If that had never been invented we would still be pumping lead into our streets today as a "cost of life" or more realistically, a cost of doing business.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Piston aircraft still use it. Which makes it doubly annoying when some tit in a cesna decides to circle around town at 1000'.
Not just making a noise, also cropdusting with TEL.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

Luckily that is beginning to change. But it is crazy that it has taken so long to do.

There seems to be two octane ratings that now have an unleaded replacement. (I don't know how many there actually are in use.)

[–] LustyArgonianMana 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Cars still offgas other heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, nickel), and rhe wear from their tires also distributes heavy metals. Tractors do the same in our fields and have for decades. It's not good. Instead of developing drones for the military, we should develop them for our food supply first.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 months ago (3 children)

We use Teflon-coated cookingwear even though we know it's poison.
Yes, yes, I know, technically it's not a problem if you don't scratch or over-heat it. But in my experience, 99% of non-stick pans get scratched and over-heated.

[–] datelmd5sum 15 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Technically scratches should not be an issue, since teflon is very inert and will go through your systems without affecting anything. Over-heating it will make toxic without a question and I'll throw out any overheated cookingwear and just get new ones.

If you're paying attention it's not difficult to keep the temp below the temperature where teflon starts breaking down (260°C / 533 K): sunseed oil starts smoking at 230°C, butter below 200°C and heating oils to their smoke point is already something you should avoid if you care about your health.

[–] SkunkWorkz 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Problem is how they make that shit. These factories have been dumping pfas into the environment for decades. And many factory workers got sick or infertile. That shit will give you cancer if have a lot of it in your bloodstream.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

If it does get scratched you can use sandpaper to turn it into a normal pan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago (21 children)

Me using my scratched teflon pans.

[–] WhatAmLemmy 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

That's every "non-stick" pan after 1-2 months of daily use.

All non-stick, "scratch resistant" pans are a marketing gimmick designed to have the average consumer-moron buy 30 pans in their lifetime, than simply learn how to season pans properly and hand 2 or 3 Iron/steel pans down their family lineage for generations, across hundreds of years.

[–] Ibaudia 14 points 2 months ago

Ceramic ones are a bit better but for the most part this is correct. There really isn't a clear reason not to cook with steel or iron, they tend to be the best options for 99.9% of applications. Only thing that I can think of is cooking eggs at a lower temp, but iron does that fine if the seasoning is really good.

[–] surewhynotlem 8 points 2 months ago

My scanpan has been in use for at least 6 years unscratched

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Also, a lot of nonstick pan coatings are incredibly shortlived and end up in your food if you continue to use a scrarched pan.

[–] LustyArgonianMana 24 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I will never use Teflon again. Even using it correctly will kill a bird in the same room. Canary in a coal mine. I won't touch the stuff. Stainless steel or cast iron.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

My uncle's parrot he had for a really long time died because he put up some kind of new shades for his living room that off gassed something deadly to birds.

He knew about not using Teflon but not about window shades, or uv resistant plastic products off gassing being hazardous. He was devastated. Some of the shit sold to us is genuinely toxic. It's really messed up when you think about it.

[–] LustyArgonianMana 8 points 2 months ago

Yes, including in MDF, laminate, most finishes on wood, most plastics, most paints and perfumes. Cement and concrete. Tires. Car exhaust. And there's a lot I'm missing.

[–] prof_wafflez 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)
[–] LustyArgonianMana 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

PTFE is still allowed and can kill birds from the fumes.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I bought a nonstick wok and my friends kept using steel wool and chipping it and I kept freaking out on them about it. I'm like STOP IT, I'd rather it be dirty than this!

They used to make fun of me freaking out about it.

I feel a bit vindicated with my freak outs now.

[–] LustyArgonianMana 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You should have thrown it away after the first chip. Anyone reading this, THROW AWAY your chipped Teflon!! Replace with cast iron

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RunawayFixer 11 points 2 months ago

My family (parents etc) have mostly learned their lesson now after all the news coverage, but before that I used to resort to hiding my good non sticks whenever they were staying over. If my parents complained about the shitty old pans that were available, then I pulled out my very sticky nonstick ceramic pan that they had roughed up despite my protests. I'm never throwing that shitty ceramic pan away, it's way too effective as a rhetorical ploy now.

Friends I still mostly don't trust since I don't know their kitchen habits well enough, but they're less likely to try to help with cooking anyhow, only with dish washing and there it's easy to hide the wrong sponges.

If your chipped nonstick is teflon, then it's garbage now imo. I would never cook in it again, too risky imo.

And I now realize that I've become paranoid in my own kitchen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fireweed 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You say this like we don't still have kitchenware with lead (or other nasties like cadmium) in them, often for purely aesthetic reasons. Most of these are discontinued products still in circulation, but some are still being produced (in theory they're "safe for use" because the heavy metals are sealed behind something nontoxic, but scratches and chips may expose them).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

AESTHETIC reasons?? girl lead poisoning isn't worth a pretty pot.

[–] fireweed 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Everyone makes fun of California's prop 65 warnings, but this is exactly the situation they exist for: knowing which colorful plate sets to avoid at Crate & Barrel.

[–] chiliedogg 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The problem is it doesn't have a minimum quantify before reporting is required, so 1 pay per trillion of any of 10,000 different substances triggers the warning, so there isn't anything that doesn't require the warning.

The standard essentially requires an unachievable level purity along every step of the manufacturing and distribution process in order to NOT have the label.

The result is over-labeling, which results in products that we should actually be concerned about sneaking into our homes because we ignore warning labels.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

Except the law was really poorly worded with no downside for false reporting. As a result literally everything has the label on it, up to and including a generic message at the front doors of the store telling you that going in the building will cause cancer and reproductive harm.

[–] captainlezbian 9 points 2 months ago

Ok but can we make fun of the fact that they aren’t required to specify which material? Like let me decide if it carcinogenic enough

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] portuga 18 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Wait you guys don’t cook with asbestos?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›