this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
351 points (86.2% liked)

politics

19244 readers
3121 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

JD Vance, no fan of gender-neutral bathrooms, was photographed in his high school yearbook next to three girls posing in front of urinals in a bathroom during his senior year.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 169 points 4 months ago (18 children)

I'm no fan of Vance, but I'm really struggling to see why this photo matters.

[–] [email protected] 191 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He supports criminalising people of the 'wrong' gender using the wrong bathroom.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That really isn't what's happening in the photo, as I've said in more detail elsewhere in the thread, and pretending that's what's being depicted makes the attack look foolish and desperate.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (9 children)

I see girls in a boys' bathroom for a joke picture? Is that not what it is? That's what he's advocating to criminalise.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] EmpathicVagrant 78 points 4 months ago (3 children)

His hypocrisy between what he’s done and what he says.

[–] Thatuserguy 76 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I dunno man, downvote me or whatever, but this really feels like it's reaching? This is literally just him fucking around as a kid in high school. Who cares?

He's a piece of shit no doubt, but hate him for the stupid shit he's saying and doing now and recently. Not for some random photo of him from over 20 years ago.

[–] dohpaz42 29 points 4 months ago (4 children)

For what it’s worth, I have to agree with you. I guess people forget that kids do stupid shit in high school, and this photo isn’t really that stupid. Now if this was a photo of Vance organizing a right-wing group in high school, that might be noteworthy.

[–] davidagain 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Under his proposed law, these girls would be guilty of a crime and would be sex offenders for using a bathroom that doesn't match their birth sex. The fact that it's in a school makes it "worse".

You might say that's unreasonable, but the unreasonable thing is the law, not the kids.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I don't know what these psychopaths have to do before people like this (not you if that wasn't clear) listen to what they're saying. It's unbelievable. Vance openly supports legislation that would literally make these girls criminals, period.

They're telling us who they are, and exactly what they will do. Please listen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

I went from super conservative evangelical, even harder right than my parents in many ways, in high school, very nearly got pulled into even further right stuff in young adulthood, and now am basically the opposite of all of that. Had facebook been a thing when I was that age, who knows what nonsense I would have been spouting or doing.

I despise Vance and all the he and his ilk stand for, but I agree this just doesn't feel right to me.

[–] Moops 20 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah this is a reach. He's a big enough turd we really don't need to stretch this much.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"So one day you're posing with girls in the boys bathroom and 22 years later you're against it. WHICH IS IT VANCE???"

I guess it's just another Phone-it-in-Friday.

Edit: Shit I'm tired. Forgot what damn day it was.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

This really isn't that, though. These women aren't using a men's room, they're posing for a photo. They certainly aren't trans men using a men's room, as is their damn right should they wanna.

It's high schoolers being silly.

Vance is a deplorable man with deplorable ideologies but this doesn't demonstrate any hypocrisy.

This kind of "gotcha" is uncritical, unserious, and looks desperate.

[–] DMBFFF 29 points 4 months ago

It shows he's changed: he's no longer cool, man.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago (5 children)

He's pushing for laws that make what you see in that pic a crime.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ValorieAF 13 points 4 months ago

If anything it's just a bit.. weird....

[–] slickgoat 9 points 4 months ago

Thank the gods they didn't have the internet in my younger days. Still, fuck that guy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago

I tend to agree and give a ton of leeway to stupid, offensive stuff from years past that people have evolved from. We all said and did stupid stuff that we regret. However, this isn't offensive, and that's to highlight that Vance either A. regressed in his values from being normal to being weirdly pro-hyper-traditional gender roles or B. has no true beliefs and is just saying what he says because he thinks it wins him votes.

[–] exanime 6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

So JD Vance has proven to be one of the most hypocritical people in politics, which is a lot to say, like saying he is the one of the people with most guns in Texas or something like that.

This pic, and others like it, are basically checking ALL boxes on the stuff he seemed to be OK with before but now denounces because he is a weird hypocrite.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Illegalmexicant 53 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Are we a week away from a picture of him in blackface?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

I just about guarantee such a picture exists somewhere.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I went to a summer camp in the 80s and 90s and we had this big event where the camp was separated into groups and each given a country. There were a ton of events, but some of the events were writing a song about the country and then another where you would act out some spirit event for the country. Always points for being dressed up with "traditional" clothing from the country.

It was a wretched hive of cultural appropriation and stereotypes. The song I remember the most is about how everyone was starving in Ethiopia. I saw some pictures of us all dressed and man oh man, if I were running for office those would be incredibly embarrassing.

Know what I know now, I realize how wrong the whole thing was and doesn't represent me at all 30 years later. In fact I even stand against these things now.

One could easily look at these and claim im some massive hypocrite. But the reality is that I was a dumb teen having fun and now I've grown up.

On some level, I feel bad for people who think we should hold shit that happened as a teenager against us...like were you not out having fun being an impetous dumbass? Is these nothing you did as a teenager that you wouldn't do now or think is wrong?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I basically agree with you, but the subtext is a little different.

I don't think this photo is damning in any way. It looks like some kids having fun in a pretty typical way. It's pretty normal for kids to "joke," and play around with gender. But this dude had some fun as a teen and now he's trying his damnedest to ensure no one ever gets to express themselves in a way that is incongruous with their agab. It's worth pointing out that that's shitty for some specific reasons.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He's a piece of shit because his policies are terrible. Whether or not his current actions are congruent with his actions as a teen, which is true for most all of us, are two separate things.

I don't believe he's genuine, but if he is, like I am with my current beliefs, stupidity as kid shouldn't be held as some evidence against who he is now.

Don't get me wrong, when I first saw this my reaction was "he's the gift that keeps on giving" but after some introspection, the more I think about it, the less I like it.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist 13 points 4 months ago

See that's just it I don't think this picture shows that he was stupid as a kid I think it shows that he's unwilling to grant the freedom of self-expression and self-discovery that he went through to kids today.

It's not his participation in this picture that is damning in any way, It's who he is now that damns him.

The kid in this picture was doing normal kid shit, I can't even figure out why someone might be offended by it but I know a Republican WOULD immediately reach for their pearlsif they saw this picture thinking it was taken recently. They would call it wokeness, and attribute it to the deep state.

It seems like JD Vance hasn't always been a creeper weirdo, and maybe at one point in his life people found him funny.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

That's a good point. It's just kinda funny because my reaction to it is basically "wow. maybe he actually used to be a real human."

I think probably this just illustrates that he's not genuine. That said I like your reflection that past behaviour should not be used as evidence against who a person is currently. That's probably a good baseline, even if the past evidence could actually be viewed in a positive light.

Anyways. Thanks for the thoughtful exchange.

[–] n0m4n 8 points 4 months ago

I agree with the teen stuff. At some point, we expect that people quit the dumb, attention seeking behavior. If they don't learn, it becomes weird. It also is why the weird meme sticks so hard. It is MAGA signature brand.

TLDR: Kleenex became synonymous for tissues. MAGA is weird in the same way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

~~“Kamala Harris created inflation that’s crushing American families, caused a historic crisis at our southern border, and allowed deadly fentanyl to flood into communities across our country,~~ (complete bullshit) and this is what the media is worried about,” a spokesperson for Vance told The Daily Beast in a statement when asked about the photo.

“A goofy high school yearbook from over 20 years ago? Get a life,” the spokesperson concluded (I actually 100% agree with this.)

This is just fucking stupid. There are half a billion more important things to discuss, we don't need this kind of stupidity in the national conversation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (3 children)

JD Vance puts his cast iron in the dishwasher pass it on

[–] TheGoldenGod 11 points 4 months ago

These were his early years, where he was only experimenting with dry humping ottomans.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] marx2k 27 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Why did this matter? At all?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 4 months ago

For normal people? It doesn't matter in the slightest.

For MAGA? Who knows. Probably something something trans ruining society

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ATDA 24 points 4 months ago

Weird photo.

I mean I don't care about the bathroom stuff, he's just weird.

[–] Aolley 20 points 4 months ago

who cares about this? I mean if it's something he's still into yeah but teenagers will take lots of photos that are not to be taken seriously

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

The three other girls in the picture were the president, treasurer, and secretary, according to the outlet.

Are they trying to bait him??!! 😂

[–] kikutwo 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He's so classy, no wonder Yale wanted him.

[–] LEDZeppelin 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I’m convinced at this point that these so called elite institutions are fertile grounds for most of the rich sociopaths that are root cause of majority of current problems

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

This is high school stuff. Humorous for the yearbook, not a big deal even with his current position on trans people. I'm far more concerned about him being supportive of book writers on fascist movements. As Obama has said in the past, stay focused. We don't need to make things more than they are when there's bad stuff readily available to attack.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Seeing this picture of JD Vance made it all make sense.

The suits, the apparent eyeliner, the sudden radical changes of viewpoint, the book, the sucking up to fascists as long as they will keep paying his bills and tell him he’s acceptable. All of it. It just kind of all clicked into focus.

No hate for people who were big and awkward in high school. It’s all good, and you don’t have to grow up into the modern monstrosity that is Vance just because this is where you started. He’s actually clearly smarter than a lot of the people in that orbit. He should know better; that’s one of the things that made it all weird and hard to understand. I’m just saying that seeing where he started makes it make sense all the little incongruities about where he ended up, as of now.

load more comments
view more: next ›