this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
-151 points (3.7% liked)

Technology

60009 readers
3479 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A farmer proves the Tesla Cybertruck is a workhorse, defying critics with a video showcasing impressive features.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a good fit for a paid for piece from Elon.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I guess the Fortnite publicity stunt isn't going so well.

[–] CosmoNova 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't play the game so I've got no stocks in this, but why on earth did Epic even agree to it? Tesla must've put a ridiculous amount of zeroes on that paycheck. I mean you might as well put Hitler's car in it at this point.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Also, the reception from players has not gone well.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I don't understand what the best case scenario is on a ad campaign like that. 12 year olds think that cybertrucks are cool and make their parents spend 100k on one?

[–] givesomefucks 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The sole positive is he can plug a welder into it...

But it's a hell of a lot cheaper to just put a generator in the bed of a real truck. Plus you won't accidentally use all your battery welding and be stuck. Since you can't just bring out a new battery, you'd have to tow it back.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Also, it costs $100k. No sane farmer is spending $100k on a work truck that's inevitably going to get really dirty and banged up.

[–] owenfromcanada 17 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And won't survive things like... getting sprayed with water.

[–] Plopp 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You're being unreasonable, it's a farm not an ocean! Ever seen a water farm? Didn't think so.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don't know man, a lot of work trucks can get to six figures pretty easily once you start adding utility beds and the like. Especially if you start with a one ton.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I agree, but those people don't tend to be farmers, in my experience (or maybe I only know poor farmers).

[–] RagingSnarkasm 2 points 4 months ago

Those are required features for interstate commuters.

Source: I used to have to commute on the interstate with them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Have you seen the bed of a cybertruck? It's barely usable

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Not talking about the cyber truck. I'm talking about actual pickups. The Fords, the Chevys, the Rams, and the like. Stuff people actually use for work. You can't swap the bed on the cybertruck

[–] HangingFruit 1 points 4 months ago

It rhymes. Was it intentional? lol

[–] CaptainKickass 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Alternative headline:

Farmer inexplicably spends over 100 grand buying trash

[–] yggstyle 28 points 4 months ago

Go easy on the farmers it's not their fault John Deere has conditioned them to do that.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 months ago

My extremely progressive by American farmer standards uncle, who has driven a Prius for non-farm travel for over a decade, would probably stare at this article silently, turn, and walk out to the barn to continue working. Just about the harshest response that man ever gives.

[–] ekZepp 21 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What a funny account. Created in July and only full of tech articles posts with zero comments...

...

🔒

[–] qaz 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I've checked and they posted an article from "ibtimes" 26 (!!) times

Site Posts
www.ibtimes.co.uk 26
www.techtimes.com 10
www.hngn.com 4

Some further analysis shows that all 3 are using the same name server provider (AWS) and have the same registrant name (a company called PERFECT PRIVACY, LLC). Techtimes and HNGN are also both hosted at Google Cloud, but ibtimes is hosted at AWS. Making it seem like the account is attempting to increase backlinks to their sites. But it could also just be a coincidence of course.

Edit 2024-08-16: They posted another article from IBNTIMES.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It could be those are just preferred news sources for them. If I were in the habit of reading news and posting what I thought was interesting, I would probably browse a handful of sites and maybe you'd be able to see a similar pattern.

But I can't figure why they never comment. Not even to add clarifying information or links or whatever.

[–] qaz 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

We can ask and maybe get their first comment in the process. [email protected]

[–] asap 7 points 4 months ago

Doing the Lord's work, that's an easy add to the block list.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Their posts are largely well received and commented, but yeah it's a little weird. I can think of a few possibilities for this, but whatever they're doing doesn't seem like typical user behavior. They don't seem to be shilling for Tesla because I see at least one semi-negative post.

shrug

[–] gedaliyah 1 points 4 months ago

Is this the most downvoted post on Lemmy?