this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
699 points (98.6% liked)

Memes

45753 readers
2183 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 96 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] NorthWestWind 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] semperverus 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Just got this card as an upgrade to my 5700xt. It is so good, and REALLY pretty.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lizardking27 94 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Ugh. Can I just say how much I fucking HATE how every single fucking product on the market today is a cheap, broken, barely functional piece of shit.

I swear to God the number of times I have to FIX something BRAND NEW that I JUST PAID FOR is absolutely ridiculous.

I knew I should've been an engineer, how easy must it be to sit around and make shit that doesn't work?

Fucking despicable. Do better or die, manufacturers.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Most of the time, the product itself comes out of engineering just fine and then it gets torn up and/or ruined by the business side of the company. That said, sometimes people do make mistakes - in my mind, it’s more of how they’re handled by the company (oftentimes poorly). One of the products my team worked on a few years ago was one that required us to spin up our own ASIC. We spun one up (in the neighborhood of ~20-30 million dollars USD), and a few months later, found a critical flaw in it. So we spun up a second ASIC, again spending $20-30M, and when we were nearly going to release the product, we discovered a bad flaw in the new ASIC. The products worked for the most part, but of course not always, as the bug would sometimes get hit. My company did the right thing and never released the product, though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's almost never the engineers fault. That whole Nasa spacecraft that exploaded was due to bureaucracy and pushing the mission forwards.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Capitalism: "Make as much as possible as fast as possible"

[–] Allonzee 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Capitalism: "Growth or die!"

Earth: I mean... If that's how it's gotta be, you little assholes🤷👋🔥

It's kind of gallows hilarious that for all the world's religions worshipping ridiculous campfire ghost stories, we have a creator, we have a remarkable macro-organism mother consisting of millions of species, her story of hosting life going back 3.8 billion years, most living in homeostasis with their ecosystem.

But to our actual, not fucking ridiculous works of lazy fiction creator, Earth, we literally choose to treat her like our property to loot, rape, and pillage thoughtlessly, and continue to act as a cancer upon her eyes wide open. We as a species are so fucking weird, and not the good kind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buddahriffic 10 points 3 months ago

It's not easy to make shit that doesn't work if you care about what you're doing. I bet there's angry debates between engineers and business majors behind many of these enshitifications.

Though, for these Intel ones, they might have been less angry and more "are you sure these risks are worth taking?" because they probably felt like they had to push them to the extreme to compete. The angry conversations probably happened 5-10 years ago before AMD brought the pressure when Intel was happy to assume they had no competition and didn't have to improve things that much to keep making a killing. At this point, it's just a scramble to make up for those decisions and catch up. Which their recent massive layoffs won't help with.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (15 children)

Ryzen gang

My 7800x3d is incredible, I won't be going back to Intel any time soon.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm still staying with my 5950X. So many cores!

[–] SuperIce 4 points 3 months ago

Not sure how much longer I'll be using the 5950x tbh. We've reached a point where the mobile processors have faster multicore (for the AI 370) than the 5950X without gulping down boatloads of power.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Also on the 7800X3D. I think I switched at just the right time. I've been on Intel since the Athlon XP. The next buy would have been 13/14th gen.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (9 children)

im a fan of no corporation especially not fucking amd, but they have been so much better than intel recently that im struggling to understand why anyone still buys intel

[–] Angry_Autist 14 points 3 months ago

Of all the CPU and GPU manufacturers out there, AMD is the most consistently pro-consumer with the least corporate fuckery, so I take mighty exception at your 'especially not fucking amd' comment.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kamen 21 points 3 months ago

Don't be a fan of one or the other, just get what's more appropriate at the time of buying.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Intel has not halted sales or clawed back any inventory. It will not do a recall, period. The company is not currently commenting on whether or how it might extend its warranty.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They may be greedy but they are not stupid. Clearly they calculated that by just ignoring the issue and eating the lawsuits, they save money compared to trying to make an actual solution (whatever that would even look like in the first place)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (4 children)

For CPUs nothing beats AMD

[–] scrion 23 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

For years, Intel's compiler, math library MKL and their profiler, VTune, really only worked well with their own CPUs. There was in fact code that decreased performance if it detected a non-Intel CPU in place:

https://www.agner.org/optimize/blog/read.php?i=49&v=f

That later became part of a larger lawsuit, but since Intel is not discriminating against AMD directly, but rather against all other non-Intel CPUs, the result of the lawsuit was underwhelming. In fact, it's still a problem today:

https://www.extremetech.com/computing/302650-how-to-bypass-matlab-cripple-amd-ryzen-threadripper-cpus

https://medium.com/codex/fixing-intel-compilers-unfair-cpu-dispatcher-part-1-2-4a4a367c8919

Given that the MKL is a widely used library, people also indirectly suffer from this if they buy an AMD CPU and utilize software that links against that library.

As someone working in low-level optimization, that was/is a shitty situation. I still bought an AMD CPU after the latest fiasco a couple of weeks ago.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Honestly even with gpus now too. I was forced to team green for a few years because they were so far behind. Now though, unless you absolutely need a 4090 for some reason, you can get basically the same performance from and, for 70% of the cost

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] w2tpmf 16 points 3 months ago (5 children)

This keeps getting slightly misrepresented.

There is no fix for CPUs that are already damaged.

There is a fix now to prevent it from happening to a good CPU.

[–] exanime 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

But isn't the fix basically under clocking those CPU?

Meaning the "solution" (not even out yet) is crippling those units before the flaw cripples them?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

They said the cause was a bug in the microcode making the CPU request unsafe voltages:

Our analysis of returned processors confirms that the elevated operating voltage is stemming from a microcode algorithm resulting in incorrect voltage requests to the processor.

If the buggy behaviour of the voltage contributed to higher boosts, then the fix will cost some performance. But if the clocks were steered separately from the voltage, and the boost clock is still achieved without the overly high voltage, then it might be performance neutral.

I think we will know for sure soon, multiple reviewers announced they were planning to test the impact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] w2tpmf 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That was the first "Intel Baseline Profile" they rolled out to mobo manufacturers earlier in the year. They've roll out a new fix now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I switched to AMD largely for better battery performance, but this mades me feel like I dodged a bullet.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] angrystego 11 points 3 months ago

I thought the point would be a depressed and self deprecating "I'm something of an Intel CPU myself".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Glad my first self-built PC is full AMD (built about a year ago).

Screw Intel and Nvidia

7700X is what it was built with

[–] ByteJunk 8 points 3 months ago

This. Full AMD on my last build as well.

I don't care about any corp, I was looking at best bang for buck at the time. I was shocked how everyone I knew was like you should get this intel or that Nvidia, and when I asked why not <comparable performance AMD at 2/3 the price>, all I was getting back was marketing blabber.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bruhduh 9 points 3 months ago
[–] bruhduh 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (5 children)

Amd 5700u and fx8150 still going strong

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›