this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
263 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19221 readers
2555 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LEDZeppelin 57 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

JD talks big game about being weird “family guy” while running on platform that cuts child tax credits. At the same time these assholes are blaming Biden and Harris for cutting child tax credits.

Republicans can not be trusted for shit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

It did expire under a dem-held house, senate, and presidency.

Of course it's disingenuous as fuck for a republican to say that since the republicans are even more opposed to it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's barely a democratic senate when they have to rely on Manchin to overcome a Republican filibuster.

But that absolutely should have been gone when they had a super majority.

[–] Maggoty 1 points 4 months ago

Fun fact. You don't need 60 votes to kill the filibuster. Keeping the filibuster is cover for conservative Democrats.

[–] dogsnest 37 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Not accepting federal funds is plain weird.

[–] DxK 31 points 4 months ago

Oh Republicans will accept federal funds for all sorts of things. It’s just that they‘re morally opposed to helping children avoid starvation.

[–] sensiblepuffin 11 points 4 months ago

Republicans will guzzle from the spigot of federal highway funding no problem. It's just when there's funds available to actually have a positive effect on their communities that they decide they're fiscally conservative.

[–] uberdroog 28 points 4 months ago

Something something boot straps. Twats.

[–] Snapz 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And the gop laughs and kicks her while she cries.

[–] cultsuperstar 3 points 4 months ago

Is she a Republican? They love voting for people that make their lives harder.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Why though? Haven't you heard of the marvelous trickle-down-economy? /s

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 months ago