this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
21 points (81.8% liked)

Casual Conversation

1622 readers
346 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Is like they asked a 8 year old who watched transformers to name them plus drawing the logos. Especially in NBA and NFL.

Also the idea of a city "buying a team" from another state blows my mind... Imagine if that was a thing in Europe, Chelsea FC, in Newcastle or Bayern München in Hamburg. Barcelona FC In Madrid... That would cause a riot lol

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I agree with cities buying teams being ridiculous, but I much prefer "THE ORIOLES" or "THE TIDES" to "[city name] [sport] [club]". It's okay to get a little goofy with it - life is too short to be serious all the time. Have a little character to you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I did not expect to see the Tides referenced in this thread. Hi neighbor.

[–] PugJesus 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] DaMonsterKnees 2 points 3 months ago

So Virginia?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It just sounds less prestigious. These team are a century old, most of them at least. Also I'm not against names, but against corny ones, real Madrid isn't the name of the city, but sounds great.

[–] evidences 10 points 3 months ago

I mean as far as age goes, if I counted right, 16 of the 30 teams in Major League Baseball are over 120 years old. Also it's not like teams in England don't have nicknames if they didn't I wouldn't spend so much of my time ponder what in the hell a womble is.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

I've seen Real [insert city] as a team name often. What is real supposed to mean in this context? It's a REAL team? It's REALly based in [city name]? Or pointing out that the other team in town isn't REAL?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I think you're confusing prestigious with pretentious.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 months ago

If you haven't looked at minor league baseball teams yet, it's worth the dive. My personal favorite is the Rocket City Trash Pandas.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You keep mentioning “prestige”, what’s so prestigious about a city name? Also sometimes teams change names. Like at one point the Jazz became the Hornets. If Barcelona FC moved to Madrid it could just be renamed Madrid FC. No fuss there. Why does a sports team have to be tied to a place? Which matters more, the team or the location?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You keep getting downvoted because you’re not really explaining yourself well. Let’s say all of the players, coaches, etc. just up and moved to another city but left the team name behind. What would be the difference between that and moving the whole team. I guess why question is what constitutes “the team”? Is it the players or the place. And if the latter, what does the place provide to that of the team?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Team names were originally tied to local history, local flora and fauna, and nicknames for the locals.

For example, people from Indiana became nicknamed the Hoosiers.

Then the Hoosiers nickname got picked up as the sports teams' name for Indiana University Bloomington.

Similarly, (University of Tennessee) Volunteers

And so on and so forth

My favorite of these is the Toledo Mud Hens minor league baseball team.

Then came major pro sports... The pro teams started out as named for local things, but as they discovered national sports broadcasting and marketing, the names became more and more generic to appeal to a wider audiences, so now you get names like Washington Commanders (which is a vast improvement from their long standing insulting name of Redskins, BTW).

Then there are the teams that moved whose names don't make sense for where they're located... The Minneapolis Lakers were named after the Great Lakes of that region, then they moved and became the Los Angeles Lakers, which doesn't make local sense at all.

[–] SuperEars 4 points 3 months ago

The Florence Y'alls are named after the locally famous Florence Y'all Water Tower

[–] Plopp 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You kinda have to have the stupid names when moving teams. Chelsea FC would be Chelsea Megakillers FC and would then be Newcastle Megakillers FC.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Both shouldn't be a thing to be begin with. Is like you lost prestige with a silly name plus not being really rooted to a city.

[–] Carighan 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, it's one thing to buy the functional parts of a team, say the trainer + the players. But you buy them into your city's team.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a tradition that mostly started with just the name of the color of their socks.

Not really any different than the Italian National team being "Azzurri"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's a nickname though, and also that's a national team.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We're talking about nicknames.

New York Yankees = City Nickname

Yankee Global Enterprises, LLC = official legal name

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Nobody on the damn planet is going to call them Yankee global enterprises, cmon. Also Yankees is I think the only exception of a half decent name. Isn't as childish as "raptors" or whatever

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I just right now called them the Yankee Global Enterpirse. Checkmate.

Also, Toronto (Raptors) is not in the US, fyi.

[–] Taco2112 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That’s your opinion and you’re more than entitled to it. My opinion is that having a logo on your jersey is much cooler than having the name of an airline or some other megacorp on it.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Here nobody thinks on the corp. Owning the team. Is all about the city representation.

[–] Taco2112 2 points 3 months ago

Again, that’s your opinion, mine is that’s the teams are walking advertisements as is every jersey that is bought by a fan.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

What a weird thing to be bothered by; Americans are so... shuffles deck...dumb with sports team names. I've seen quite a few like this lately, it's kinda funny.

Anyway, I'll admit there are some dumb names, especially in semi pro but how can you argue names like Raiders, Patriots, Eagles, 76ers, 49ers, Rangers, Trailblazers, etc. My personal stupid favorites are the Lakers (as in bodies of water) from Los Angeles, they moved from Minneapolis in the 60s and then the Utah Jazz, um Utah...Jazz? Yeah, they moved from New Orleans in the 70s. You'd be hard pressed to find any natural lakes in LA and I'd guess the jazz scene in Utah is underwhelming (never been there myself).

US cities don't buy teams. Rich fucks do and move them to what they presume to be a more profitable and/or friendly market.

What's hilarious to me about US sports is the soccer (yes, in the US it's called soccer, I don't make the rules) teams trying so hard to act like they're European teams. Cmon folks, you aren't an FC, you're an SC.