this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
66 points (85.9% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Buffalox 26 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Goddam nepotism and he's an asshole working for Uber!
That's a very bad choice IMO, even if he is good at it, it doesn't look good.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 4 months ago

Not just nepotism, but also possibly inciting family drama along with it (at least that's what happened last time, in 2020). Plus all the shit with union busting and Uber.

I hate everything about this tbh.

[–] return2ozma 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

And there it is... He's taking a leave

Uber Legal Chief Tony West to Take Leave for Harris Campaign

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/uber-legal-chief-tony-west-212629649.html

[–] Boozilla 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Not good. How many jokes / stories featuring a brother-in-law end well.

[–] Buffalox 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh boy, how can Harris not see this is bad?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago

Maybe saw it but pressured to use him? a brother in law would know too much about her personal life if you know what I mean

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is he even getting paid? Don’t see it in the article

[–] Buffalox 1 points 4 months ago

No he is not, he is volunteering. But it's still problematic to put him in such a high position.

[–] return2ozma 25 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Her brother-in-law Tony West is an anti-labor/union busting top lawyer (Chief Legal Officer) at Uber. He's a piece of shit.

Kamala Harris’ brother-in-law is the public face of Uber’s fight with labor. It’s awkward.

https://www.latimes.com/politics/story/2019-09-12/kamala-harris-uber-family-campaign-drivers-labor

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/W6RHR

Another article...

Uber Says New California Employment Law Doesn't Matter Because Rides Aren't Its Core Business

Chief legal officer Tony West told reporters that the new law doesn't matter at all to Uber--because providing rides is not its primary business. If that statement makes you feel like you just stepped through the looking glass, you're not alone.

https://www.inc.com/minda-zetlin/uber-california-ab5-tony-west-employees-independent-contractors-lawsuits.html

[–] Rapidcreek 23 points 4 months ago

IDK about brother-in-law, but she now has most of the Obama campaign folks working for her. They've been known to win some elections

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump would make him Transportation Secretary

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

For close relations like that? Special presidential advisor. Transportation Secretary is for secondary nepotism.

[–] Ensign_Crab 2 points 4 months ago

Or as compensation for dropping out of the primary at the right time.

[–] HoustonHenry 11 points 4 months ago

Distance yourself, you know the GOP will drag him through the mud

[–] meco03211 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wonder how soon the weirdos will shamelessly cry nepotism at this.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is nepotism and we should give her shit for it.

Don't endanger the fucking election to toss a bone at your family.

[–] APassenger 4 points 4 months ago

Maybe he'll be the new FTC person. The current one is too effective.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

As the other posted commented. This is actually just textbook nepotism. It's like if she accepted a couple gold bars from Egypt and you said "I wonder how soon the GOP will shamelessly cry corruption at this".

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -3 points 4 months ago

Axios Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: Axios Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/axios/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.