this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
-7 points (43.4% liked)

politics

19242 readers
2376 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA) ripped the Department of Defense's finances for failing its fifth consecutive audit and inability to account for 61% of its $3.5 trillion in assets.

"The most ravenous Leviathan of our government that devours the people's wealth is the Department of Defense," Higgins said in an impassioned speech during a House Committee on Oversight and Accountability hearing on the DOD's failed audit, financial management practices.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SUPERcrazy3530 47 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That’s a loaded headline. It makes it sound like all of the missing funds went to Zelensky but that’s just a guys opinion.

[–] Specific_Skunk 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone who’s witnessed the US Military’s “use or lose” budget in action, I’d put $100 on a lot of it being jammed in a closet, sitting at the bottom of an ocean, or conveniently lost to fire in a desert somewhere.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or lost somewhere in a logistics facility unaccounted for.

[–] IonAddis 3 points 1 year ago

It's a very big closet.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is just a GOP propaganda hit piece. The DOD does need a audit, but don't act like it all went to Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Or even like the GOP would ever even CONSIDER cutting it's funding down.

[–] dilligasatall 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Especially considering it's been a DoD problem for many, many years now. The audits they talk about in the article date back to as far as 2017... this isn't a new issue.

[–] PickTheStick 2 points 1 year ago

Sheesh, one of the conspiracies about 9/11 was that the location of the pentagon hit was where they had just failed an audit. It's a gigantic pit we've been 'losing' money in for decades, if not a full century.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The state of the DoDs finances is a legitimate concern, but OP and the ‘Pub the article cites are just bad faith trolling.

The truth is that in 1990, Congress passed a law directing all federal agencies to produce regular, audited financial statements. More than thirty years later, the Department of Defense is the only agency that has never passed a single audit. That’s under both Dem and Pub administrations.

The shot at Zelensky and the current geopolitical situation is just silly, stupid, and frankly the kind of thing a tankie would say 🙄

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wait. Since when are Republicans so anti-military and pro-Russian oppression? Saint Reagan is weeping over this cruel betrayal.