this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
460 points (97.5% liked)

World News

39335 readers
2704 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/19768980

archive.org link

In a historic ruling the International Court of Justice has found multiple and serious international law violations by Israel towards Palestinians in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including, for the first time, finding Israel responsible for apartheid. The court has placed responsibility with all states and the United Nations to end these violations of international law. The ruling should be yet another wake up call for the United States to end its egregious policy of defending Israel’s oppression of Palestinians and prompt a thorough reassessment in other countries as well.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 76 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can’t wait for the World Court Super Sayan Action Rangers to head down there and straighten Israel out

[–] [email protected] 57 points 5 months ago (1 children)

International diplomacy is complicated and the WC may technically be powerless to enforce a judgment but... this still does matter.

[–] SuckMyWang 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 46 points 5 months ago

If for no other reason than to let history know that this is an official opinion of a global judicial body.

[–] JacksonLamb 8 points 5 months ago

Times change, power shifts. It's good to have a record of what is happening, for future reference.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

The UN had an arms embargo on apartheid South Africa starting in the 70s, so there's precedent for that.

Fun fact: Israel violated the South Africa arms embargo. Big time.

[–] kaffiene 5 points 5 months ago

In the same way that diplomacy matters to anything

[–] [email protected] 43 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Help carry out the conviction notice of Israeli leadership by supporting BDS. No one will care about Israel when they’re broke.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, political movement that advocates boycotting Israel in support of the rights of Palestinian people

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

Don't you know that choosing not to buy products made under an aprtheid regime or by companies profitting of genocide is literally Hitler?!

At least that is what many US states and Germany want us to believe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Isn’t this illegal now in America?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

it is now illegal to not buy things. CONSUME CONSUME CONSUME!!!

[–] pyre 1 points 5 months ago

land of the free

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

In a way:

Most anti-BDS laws have taken one of two forms: contract-focused laws requiring government contractors to promise that they are not boycotting Israel; and investment-focused laws, mandating public investment funds to avoid entities boycotting Israel.

Very strange to have government contractors and managers of public funds swearing an oath to protect a different country. Similar situation in the UK. Interestingly enough, this is another case of "birds of a feather flock together":

On May 17, 2019, right-wing populist party Alternative for Germany sponsored a bill "Condemn the BDS movement – protect the existence of the State of Israel" (19/9757) to ban the BDS movement nationally.

[–] Allonzee 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

This right here is why I walked away from my species.

The less help, empathy and respect you need, the more you get.

From my perspective, that makes us monsters.