this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
186 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19145 readers
3220 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter
aidan
jordanlund
HLMenckenFan
little_cow
186
Minnesota AG compares Clarence Thomas to house slave in ‘Django Unchained’ (thehill.com)
submitted 1 year ago by inclementimmigrant to c/politics
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

And according to Samuel L. Jackson himself via NYT article,

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/20/movies/awardsseason/supporting-actor-category-is-thick-with-hopefuls.html?smid=nytcore-android-share

Mr. Jackson said, laughing. “I said, ‘O.K., now you want me to play the most hated Negro in cinematic history?’ And he was like, ‘Yeah!’ ”

As Stephen, Mr. Jackson must navigate a host of thorny issues about race and class, which he took in stride. “He believes in slavery, believes in the hierarchy of things, he’s the freest slave on that plantation,” he said. (In character, he added, “I have the same moral compass as Clarence Thomas does.”)

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago

I mean Thomas wrote in his decision on Wade v. Roe that other rulings that used similar precedent should be examined. He cited Griswold v. Connecticut, a ruling that prevents government from banning contraceptives, Lawrence v. Texas, a ruling that prevents government from banning consensual sex acts, and Obergefell v. Hodges, a ruling that prevents governments from banning same sex marriages.

He left out one ruling though, strangely enough. Loving v. Virginia a ruling that prevents government from banning interracial marriage. It uses the exact same precedent that Wade v. Roe and all the other cases used. I wonder why Clarence Thomas is alright with that ruling but not the other ones? Is it because overturning that ruling would personally effect his own interracial marriage?

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wow, that is harsh. Will Thomas be viewed as the worse Supreme Court Justice of the century?

[–] utopianfiat 47 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Thomas has actually moderated since he was in college, when he would regularly harass interracial couples on campus. Then he went on to marry a white lady.

[–] Fredselfish 15 points 1 year ago

Seriously that's fucked up. I believe he is owned by people. So definitely be someone who would if it came up before the court to vote for salver.

Mother fucker owner are billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Thomas is, without hyperbole, a race traitor - and it has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that his wife is white.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

he should have remained "moderated" at Department of Education levels of sexual harassment against his subordinates.

[–] Lifecoach5000 2 points 1 year ago

Dude has some weird sex hangups it seems for sure. Behind The Bastards did a great episode on him.

[–] FranklinsBeard 12 points 1 year ago

If not the worst, then at least top 3

[–] Alteon 19 points 1 year ago

Oh my god....that's so unbelievably accurate that it's scary.

I never would have associated the two, but now that it's been pointed out to me, I can't unsee it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could literally replace the man with Uncle Ruckus and it wouldn't change a goddamn thing.

[–] TheAlbacor 2 points 1 year ago

I was literally referred to this series by a friend just this weekend. I need to watch it.

[–] FuglyDuck 12 points 1 year ago

Just to clarify, for people, our AG is both black and freaking awesome.

I didn’t think I’d like him the first time around but Ellison has done a lot of good for Minnesota.

[–] yesman 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel unqualified talking about issues like this. So here is two minuets of Malcolm X talking about it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jf7rsCAfQCo

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=jf7rsCAfQCo

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[–] TheHighRoad 4 points 1 year ago

This is like challenging a duel with a gauntlet, Men In Tights style, damn.

[–] meldroc 4 points 1 year ago

All you have to do is put a picture of Uncle Clarence next to Stephen from Django Unchained! I swear they're identical twins!