this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
621 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

59665 readers
3476 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Ever seen one of those “warranty void if removed” stickers covering the screw holes on a gadget?

Gigabyte includes: “If the manufacturing sticker inside the product was removed or damaged, it would no longer be covered by the warranty.”

“The Warranty Act prohibits warrantors of consumer products costing more than five dollars from conditioning their written warranties on a consumer’s use of any article or service, such as repair service, which is identified by brand, trade, or corporate name, unless (1) the warranty states the article or service will be provided to the consumer for free, or (2) the warrantor has been granted a waiver by the Commission,” the FTC writes.

“FTC investigators have copied and preserved the online pages in question, and we plan to review your company’s written warranty and promotional materials after 30 days,” the agency is telling each firm.

In 2018, the FTC put Nintendo, Sony, and Microsoft on notice for doing the same thing with their game consoles, as well as Asus, HTC, and Hyundai.

iFixit has a blog on how “warranty void if removed” stickers may be legal in other parts of the world.


The original article contains 406 words, the summary contains 190 words. Saved 53%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] RizzRustbolt 13 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No more mouse screws under the glide pads? Be still my heart.

[–] Buddahriffic 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Yeah, Logitech. I'm going to need to open up my G900 soon because the left mouse button is starting to do the same thing my G7 did back in the day. I hope it's not more awkward due to the non-removable battery (or less removable, I guess), but the glide pads are larger on this one, I hope they adhere well after being lifted.

I just broke through the ones on my G7. Luckily they didn't bend downwards from pulling the screws out.

Actually, this time I might even look into getting a better switch instead of fixing the one they put in it. If that's even a thing, and if there even are more durable mouse button switches because it has been pressed a lot over the years.

It totally is a thing, both getting new switches on their own and the availability of a range of qualities: https://www.maketecheasier.com/replace-faulty-mouse-switches/

[–] Zak 1 points 4 months ago

The law doesn't say they can't make it difficult to service, just that they can't deny your warranty because you did.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Jokes on them as I don't care about my warranties, never did. Call me a dumb consumer, but atleast I wrecked the big evil corporation.

edit: I didn't know about Nintnedo doing this, I just knew about the cheaply made joycons that would drift by deSign after a certain point. The sollution to this was so simple but Nintendo chose not to fix it for the entire Switch's life spawn.

Leaving it up to 3rd party switch controller manufacturers. Which who knows how long untill they try to ban 3rd party controllers on Nintendo consoles.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You didn’t wreck the big corps. You opted yourself out of their warranty thereby saving them any money they would’ve had to spend on repairing your purchase during the defined warranty window. If anything you lined their pockets by making yourself a cheaper customer.

[–] madcaesar 5 points 4 months ago

I honestly wonder how those meetings go. It has to be comical villainous to spend so much time trying to fuck over your customer not allowing them to fix what they purchased from you.

I just don't get it, if an item breaks and I can't at least try to fix it, there is no way I'm purchasing from the same brand again.

So what is the motivation here? The thing that has kept me with companies is good customer service and a generous warranty service.

Denying claims and making it impossible to fix it myself will get you instantly on my ban list.

So what gives? How did we get here?

[–] MeatStiq 1 points 4 months ago

Don't worry guys. The FTC, FAA, EPA, ... ETC. MEAN NOTHING ANYMORE!

thanks trump.