this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
394 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18034 readers
4089 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] davidagain 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nastiness. The clear connection, at its heart, it's nastiness. Lack of compassion. Zero empathy.

[–] someguy3 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately it's a little more organized than general nastiness.

[–] davidagain 6 points 4 days ago

You're right, yes.

[–] captainlezbian 22 points 4 days ago

It’s almost like both the Nazis and the queers have been saying that

[–] Drivebyhaiku 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I would argue that the connection is a lot older than Nazis. The era around 1250 responded to a nasty wave of the Black death by Christian leaders collaborating to simultaneously fight the population decline by criminalizing abortion friendly midwifery and ostracize and subjugate gender and sexual minorities because they feared the collapse of society due to a population bust. As such what was taught by the church up to that point began to get new connotations. Jewish populations were persecuted and killed as scapegoats for the cause of the plague. Folk medicine women and non-conforming men were killed and condemned for witchcraft. While women stepped up to fill the roles of men during the plague once the population was rebounding their power of place in society was to be broken as the Church leaned on it's misogynistic practices and preached of the dangers to society and the family...

Nazisim is just a more modern echo of well established means to break the power of non compliant of groups who can be scapegoated or subjugated into subservience to Christians who feel threatened, a group that centers nominally celebate and wealthy men whose only contact with women is in a subordinate role.

[–] Anti_Iridium 18 points 4 days ago

May 6th, 1933, Date of the first Nazi book burnings. The location, Berlin Institute of Sex Research.

[–] TheBigBrother 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you are not Aryan you can be sterilized WO any problem.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Given the context, I'm assuming this is sarcasm.....at least I HOPE it's sarcasm!!!

[–] TheBigBrother 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

My point is, for nazis you can perfectly be sterilized, except if you are Aryan then you can't, so the premise isn't 100% truth..

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago (15 children)

Werent the Nazis pro abortion for everyone else?

[–] givesomefucks 38 points 5 days ago (8 children)

And LGBTQ were also victims of their genocide.

Like, the largest demographic of victims were Jewish, but there was a bunch of other groups getting the same treatment.

The difference is LGBTQ was hated by both sides. After Alan Turing contributed more to stopping the nazis than probably any other single person, England chemically castrated him due to his sexual preference which likely contributed to his suicide.

Fascists always prioritize the easiest targets first

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago (10 children)

The jews were also maligned by both sides.

[–] paf0 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

One side fought for them. Or, at the very least, freed them when they won.

[–] givesomefucks 11 points 4 days ago (9 children)

What?

The war wasn't fought to stop genocide of any group, it was because Germany and their allies kept invading and attacking other countries.

This is what I'm complaining about.

People learn a feel good version of why WW2 happened in school and run with it. But it's not really that accurate, it's just what we tell kids in school.

[–] paf0 6 points 4 days ago

So, as I said, at the very least they were freed?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] tootoughtoremember 6 points 4 days ago

Probably easier to stick with "at the very least, freed them".

Pearl Harbor was the rallying cry that brought America together (mostly) to fight the Axis powers. Prior to that, isolationist (and Anti-Semitic) groups such as the America First Committee were growing in popularity. To say America was fighting for the Jews in WW2 may be technically correct based on who was responsible for the Holocaust, but it was more the byproduct of who America's enemies were at the time, rather than being a primary motivator. Coming in as the savior to a population being persecuted is rarely the real reason wars are fought.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] foggy 13 points 5 days ago

Pretty sure they were pro sterilization of basically anyone not Aryan.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

Abortions for some, a white ethnostate for others!

[–] Eldritch 2 points 4 days ago

Only as a final solution.

[–] Lost_My_Mind 1 points 5 days ago

They were pro abortion to 148th trimester adults! Well......if they were jewish (or a handfull of other things)

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Is a tree connected to its leaves?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

See? They Owned the Libs!!!

load more comments
view more: next ›