this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
61 points (87.7% liked)

Skeptic

1194 readers
30 users here now

A community for taking a critical look at pseudoscience, quackery, and boldfaced BS.

"A wise man proportions his belief to the evidence." ~ David Hume

Things we like:

• Thoughtful discussion
• Humor
• Civility

Things we don't like quite so much:

• Trolling
• Low-effort comments and posts
• Personal attacks
• Spam
• URL shorteners

Carl Sagan's Nine Precepts of Skeptical Thinking:

  1. Confirm the reality (independent of the status quo).
  2. Encourage debate on the evidence by proponents of all points of view.
  3. Avoid appeals to authority.
  4. Recognize that there is always more than one hypothesis.
  5. Do not cling to a hypothesis simply because it is yours.
  6. Attaching a numerical quantity is key to discriminating hypotheses.
  7. In a chain of argument, all the links must work—not just most of them.
  8. Everything else being equal, the simplest explanation is the most likely.
  9. Proposals that cannot be proven or shown to be false do not have much scientific value.

Suggested Fediverse Communities

RFK Jr. Watch @lemm.ee - Tackling misinformation being spread by antivaxxer politician, Robert F Kennedy Jr.
DebunkThis @lemmy.world - an evidence-based community for debunking misinformation and dubious claims.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Paragone 58 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Don't play games with disinformation.

Treating disinformation as worthy of equal-validity debate, itself "sends a message", validating the disinformation.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 days ago

Bias towards fairness means that if the entire congressional Republican caucus were to walk in to the House and propose a resolution stating that the Earth was flat, the Times would lead with "Democrats and Republicans Can't Agree on Shape of Earth."

Will McAvoy, The Newsroom

[–] FlyingSquid 12 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I understand why you're saying that, but I also think a show like this might convince fence-sitters that flat Earth ideas are nuts.

And James Randi and Penn Jillette could both say a lot about the benefits of using TV to mock pseudoscience. Adam Savage too, while we're at it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

James Randi and Johnny Carson have some takedowns of fake psychics that are some of the best things ever shown on television.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zD7OgAdCObs&t=540s

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I thought that was going to be when they switched out Uri Gellar's props. I was not disappointed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

My favorite part is Carson's pure politeness, and overt attempts to give him a fair showing and put him at ease. Like bro, any petard you're gonna get hung on is purely your own. I just wanna see you show me what you got. By all means: Go ahead.

[–] acosmichippo 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

what concerns me is they’re never going to make a show where the players never win, so that means sometimes “experts” are going to supposedly be convinced that the earth is flat. that eventuality is not going to be worth whatever benefit there may be of making flat earthers look silly (as if that hasn’t been done enough already).

[–] FlyingSquid 1 points 4 days ago

they’re never going to make a show where the players never win

Why not?

[–] TootSweet 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What would you think of a show with basically the same premise superficially but it also just constantly and blatantly ridicules the flat earthers?

[–] acosmichippo 2 points 4 days ago

you can only do that so much, it would get stale very quickly.

[–] CheeryLBottom 8 points 5 days ago

You just don't see the elephants and the Great A'Tuin under there

[–] homesweethomeMrL 3 points 5 days ago

It’s kind of A Perfect Awful