this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2024
77 points (98.7% liked)

UK Politics

2825 readers
581 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why do political parties even receive donations? It doesn't make sense to me that this is even a thing. It's just open corruption.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How else would they be funded?

[–] Clent 9 points 1 week ago

I am always amused at how normalized it has become that political leaders need to advertise themselves as if they are a bottle of coke or some other brand.

We don't pick leaders anymore, we pick brands so of course they need vast sums of money because how else does one push brand awareness and convince people they need to choose a brand.

[–] br3d 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The main alternative would be state funding, proportional to vote share. The big question would be how one establishes a new party

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The issue there is it benefits the current largest party

A system where all parties with >1% vote share get a fixed budget, with parties lower than that being required to source their own funding but not being allowed to spend more than the budget would be better as it'd allow for any realistic contender to not be as corrupt

Update:
I realised this would screw over regional parties like plaid & all Northern Irish parties... A system where funding is given per-seat but with a threshold of 5% of votes in that seat (same as to get your deposit back) would be better

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I feel like this could be dangerous, the government could just not fund a rival party or at least make it awkward to a point of being a hindrance.

There should probably be a spending limit per candidate and all their donations and finances just be fully open and audited by an independent body.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I had assumed they were, it's just a surprise that the tobacco industry isn't lobbing them cash too.