this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
124 points (98.4% liked)

News

21726 readers
4248 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One late afternoon in mid-May, a half dozen Hispanic day laborers were paid $20 each to parade in front of the White House on camera, holding signs with slogans like "I Love Biden" and "I Need Work Permit for My Family."

The stunt was orchestrated by Nick Shirley, a pro-Trump online influencer who often asks migrants on camera if they support Democratic President Joe Biden or think he made it easier for them to come to the U.S.

"We want to take you to the White House," Shirley told the men he recruited at a Home Depot parking lot, where day laborers typically wait for jobs, in a video later posted to YouTube. "What (Biden) did for migrants is very kind, right? Letting everyone come in? So we are going to show him and say thank you."

Shirley, a 22-year-old with more than 318,000 followers on social media, is among a new class of influencers supportive of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump who are helping shape the immigration debate as the U.S. election campaign heats up.

Their self-shot dispatches from American cities and the southern border with Mexico portray migrants in the country illegally as dangerous and burdensome, and part of a plan to grow the ranks of Democratic voters.

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 42 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If only those terrible Democrats had offered the Republicans literally everything they asked for on immigration in a single bill.

Because I'm sure they definitely wouldn't turn something like that down.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Dems: Fine. Here. Now can we please help Ukraine?

republiQans:

[–] gibmiser 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Uhh how could you have seen it, it’s brand new?

[–] Zachariah 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, well, I saw it on a rerun.

[–] aeronmelon 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I never get used to the descendants of genocidal colonizers complaining about people peacefully immigrating from another country.

[–] afraid_of_zombies -3 points 3 weeks ago

Hmm. I guess the only people allowed to complain would be those whose families arrived after the 1880?

Hey don't get upset at me, I am pro-open borders, I am just following the logic of what you said.

[–] Cryophilia 17 points 3 weeks ago

Oh hey it's time for The Caravan(tm) again! I was worried we wouldn't see it this election cycle

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Maybe he (Trump) should not have forced Republicans to kill the immigration legislation...

[–] afraid_of_zombies 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Forced? No one forces a member of Congress to do anything. All of them have successfull careers outside of Congress and more money than me or you will ever see.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Let's not pretend that most politicians go into Congress out of the goodness of their hearts. And let's not be naive enough to think that rich people are immune from wanting more money which being a Congress person tends to help with.

So yes, ignoring the requests of a vindictive presidential candidate means a Congress person stands a good chance of losing their seat which means less money for them.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 1 points 3 weeks ago

They go in for power. If they want only money Congress is not the way to the best way to accomplish that. Nearly every single member of Congress was a lawyer with their own firm or partner at a firm.

So yes I stand by what I said

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Trump, at the very least, told leaders to quash the bill so Biden did not get a win. The bill was basically everything Republicans were asking for.

Not that I think it was a good bill nor do I agree with Biden's EO on immigration. But it's kind of hard for Republicans to complain when they reject implementing what they want.

[–] macarthur_park 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But it's kind of hard for Republicans to complain when they reject implementing what they want.

I agree with you in principle, but clearly it’s not that hard since they are actively complaining and polls show voters trust Trump and Republicans over Biden to handle immigration. Somehow, they’re never really constrained by reality.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

That sounds like a failure of Democratic messaging which is unfortunately not uncommon. Every Democrat should be pointing out that Republicans killed an immigration bill that implemented what they wanted all because Trump asked them to. Immigration is one of the top issues for most voters (no idea why). I really wish Democrats didn't suck so bad at marketing.

One other thing I often see that Democrats suck at talking about is inflation. Most of it has been from price gouging and Biden floated the idea of a windfall tax which was completely rejected by Republicans. Now companies are lowering their prices because people are not as willing to accept the supply chain and wage increase bullshit.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 7 points 3 weeks ago

Immigration is one of the top issues for most voters

Racism. That's why, no mystery here. No one is whining about whites coming over.

[–] hroderic 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's exacerbated by the right-wing having a propaganda machine too. Democrats can communicate their wins (ineffectively as they do) but they don't make headlines like the outrage bait Fox airs. Bullshit asymmetry principle and all that.

[–] Drivebyhaiku 1 points 3 weeks ago

Democrats are bad at marketing because a lot of them come from the school of political jousting. It's easy to lose touch with what the regular person believes politics is rather than the reality of the system where you can't make solid promises because things can go very wrong and playing the game means setting up long term strategy where best case scenario you have to suck short term losses. They are mostly invested in long term preservation of the system so over promising and under delivering is a held fear. In vulgar terms it is shitting where ideologically eat.

Republicans however basically promise the moon the sun and the stars and then when it doesn't happen they just rile up their base with anti-federal sentiments to make them rabid. There's no brakes on the anger machine which means there isn't a cohesive long term strategy. It's whatever does the job right here and now so they can as a group benefit off the short term gains. It's why so many of them are individually crashing and burning. No exit strategy - just commitment to scalp what you can out of the system and ditch before you get consequences. They know they can basically say anything and get what they want.

It's a major FUBAR situation and Democrats are only now learning how to publicly perform a sense of political urgency.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 2 points 3 weeks ago

Polls. The Facepals/Instatag of the 1950’s.