this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
160 points (99.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6600 readers
633 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RightHandOfIkaros 19 points 5 months ago

"Three Day Special Operation"

[–] uservoid1 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The WWI inventory is decreasing, time to bring out the big guns

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

This looks even older...

[–] MrJameGumb 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is actually a non fossil fuel reliant propulsion system. Simply fire the cannon in the opposite direction you want to travel and be blown towards your destination! This picture was actually taken while the car was in reverse

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

The GTA special

[–] [email protected] 13 points 5 months ago

Collects antique cannons and samovars, classy

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The real question is why this person wants to buy old samowars. To shoot them?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

Tea is delicious life. You get a craving, you don't care about the heavy metals leaching in from your vintage score.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Fades 5 points 5 months ago

It’s all ru has

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This would legit be a force multiplier in the 19th century or earlier, especially if they up-armored the front. In fact, I bet something like this was done in the 1632 series of novels.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Right... so how would you go about aiming it while in motion? or loading?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Not in motion - shoot and scoot. Though you definitely have a point with loading. Back to the drawing board...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

On his way to capture Kharkiv

[–] verity_kindle 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Juiced up suspension? That (lada?) is not sagging as much as it should.

[–] Hubi 5 points 5 months ago

Looks like the load is distributed evenly.