this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
207 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39039 readers
2643 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

An Australian judge has ruled that the social media platform X is subject to a state’s anti-discrimination law even though it does not have an office in Australia.

Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Judge Ann Fitzgerald said in a decision made public Friday that her court has jurisdiction over X Corp. in a hate speech complaint.

The ruling allows the Queensland Human Rights Commission to hear an allegation that X breached Queensland anti-discrimination law by failing to remove or hide anti-Muslim hate speech.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

X had argued that the tribunal had no jurisdiction over the company because it had no presence in Queensland and the “impugned conduct” took place outside Queensland.

Musk wants to have his cake and eat it too. On the one hand, he says he's a free speech absolutist. On the other hand, he says that free speech is “simply means that which matches the law.” So the law here says you don't geoblock, you delete the video from your servers.

Which is it, Elon?

Oh right, Australia isn't India.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

If X wants to geoblock all of Australia they're welcome to. I applaud any effort to speed along X's irrelevance.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Judge Ann Fitzgerald said in a decision made public Friday that her court has jurisdiction over X Corp. in a hate speech complaint.

The Australian Muslim Advocacy Network, which brought the case against Twitter in June 2022 before billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk bought and rebranded the platform last year, welcomed the decision as “precedent-setting.”

Fitzgerald’s decision “paved the way for social media companies to be held accountable for locally accessible content that may breach Australian hate speech laws,” the network said in a statement.

The complaint deals with material including video and photos that can be accessed through a link posted on X by an alleged far-right anti-Muslim conspiracy blog authored by an American citizen.

The tribunal has accepted the network’s request that the blog and its principal author not be identified for fear of “adverse consequences” for Muslims.

Musk is also fighting in Australian Federal Court a notice by an Internet safety watchdog to take down video of a 16-year-old boy allegedly stabbing an Assyrian Orthodox bishop in a Sydney church on April 15.


The original article contains 422 words, the summary contains 180 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] cedarmesa 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Where my elon dickriders at? Try this experiment. Use any of these words on the internet......Elon, musk, tesla, monsanto, glyphosphate, roundup, gmo, nuclear energy, fracking. A magical thing happens where the thread gets brigaded by "experts in the field" explaining why you are wrong and all these things are chock full o' vitamins. It almost feels like there is an office somewhere where people search keywords full time and throw up a firewall of bullshit to protect corporate interests.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I hate to defend Elon Musk, but Australia is in the wrong here. You don't have the authority to censor a website, for the entire world, that isn't even based in your country. Otherwise I'm sure Russia and China will be looking veeery interestedly at this...

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago

china literally blocks Google because they can't control it

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I got the impression they just want to censor it for Australia or get blocked there. Much like China does for the vast majority of the internet.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

This is a problem that's been around about as long as the WWW itself and has not really been solved yet at all.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LICRA_v._Yahoo!

Also further reading relevant here again: https://www.techdirt.com/2022/11/02/hey-elon-let-me-help-you-speed-run-the-content-moderation-learning-curve/