this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
183 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19148 readers
3991 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3 76 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

insinuated that Judge Juan Merchan "hates" him because he immigrated to the U.S. from Colombia.

At the age of 6.

[–] disguy_ovahea 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I’m not sure about Colombia, but in NY we call that “racism.”

[–] DarkSideOfTheMoon 69 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Latino community in Florida need to be more aware about his remarks.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They're conservatives. They care about hierarchy. They're the "good Latinos", and dislike others who didn't just get into the country automatically when they stepped onto dry land.

Honestly Mexicans are more conservative and it's pretty dumb of the Republicans to cater to random white racists. I bet as Mexicans in the US gain wealth the Republicans will just pretend to have loved them all along. "Those were other Republicans, not real ones like us."

[–] Plastic_Ramses 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Its only a matter of time until theyre considered "white".

For those of you who are unfamilair with the term "whiteness", you should look at how the irish and italians werent considered "white" until it was convenient.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

The scourge of single-issue voters. The party spits in their face, but it's all ok if they "support" the right thing.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (1 children)

An intelligent person wouldn’t publicly insult the judge overseeing his case, but maybe he’s quite confident that he’ll never see consequences.

[–] PseudorandomNoise 41 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s not like he’s gotten away with it multiple times or anything.

Toddlers don’t learn anything if you don’t correct bad behavior on the spot.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 12 points 6 months ago

Or, he’s literally a demented narcissistic sociopath who has escaped all consequences of man and earth. So far.

[–] Theprogressivist 24 points 6 months ago

Keep crying about your shit filled diaper, Donnie.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It would be absolutely marvelous that after he's found guilty that the judge locks him up and orders him held through his appeal process because of the absolute shitbag he is and has been this entire trial.

Will someone grow a spine?

Stay tuned to the next episode of Land of the Free and Home of the Brave.

end credits roll

[–] APassenger 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

No. He's a political candidate. What we're hoping for is a speedy denial of an appeal. But he'll slow play that part as much as he can, too.

All this wait-until-the-campaign-year BS is just BS. Prosecute when you have sufficient proof. I can't believe it all happened to land this year on accident.

And, no, I am very definitely Not defending Trump. I'm upset they didn't do this shit last year. Or the year before.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 10 points 6 months ago

Its true - the justice system was slow when it had enough people and resources to handle its workload. And that was 200 years ago.

Still. A treasonous secret-selling “president” who’s going TO DO IT AGAIN you’d think somebody with a brain, a heart, a love for this country and a super-secret red button to handle such matters - you’d think they'd have handled it by now. Guess not.

[–] jas0n 3 points 6 months ago

That's what pisses me off about Colorado kicking him off the ballot. No shit it got overturned. Ballots and whatnot were probably already printed (not from CO btw). It's not that they don't have a case.. they most certainly do. They had 3 years, and they wait until a couple months before the primary? At that point, it is interference.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, I was born here, and i hate trump with some serious spin. So, it’s not particularly relevant.

Also, unlike trump, the judge is smart and professional and has an ethical code. He probably sleeps fine.

[–] DarylDutch 4 points 6 months ago

I don't think anyone involved in this trial sleeps fine. Too many maga idiots willing to throw their lives away.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

He basically called the judge not an idiot.

[–] Coreidan 2 points 6 months ago

He’s an easy person to hate. Not surprised.