Linux

This isn’t a guide but Linux Mint is a good stepping stone.

Just for choosing: https://distrochooser.de/ - or put some distros with a tool like Ventoy on a USB stick and do a live install to test it on the actual system. The many options are a great thing, but of course not easy to get into at first. So I'd try not to overthink it, distrohopping is a hobby for some of us :D

For trying out how it looks and feels: https://distrosea.com/

For understanding more about Linux: https://linuxjourney.com/

I spent my first year of Linux installing a new distro, or same distro with a different DE probably every other week, sometimes more than once in a week. The Linux ecosystem rewards self starters with curiosity and the ability to search for answers.

LearnLinuxTV is an amazing YouTube channel, high quality distro tours and reviews, as well as tutorials at various levels of mastery. ItsFOSS and Phoronix are great sources for Linux news that help you build some awareness and vocabulary. The official forums of almost every distro are extremely helpful places to find solutions to problems. You just kinda have to be motivated to seek out the answers you need as they arise.

The best way to get into Linux is just to use it. Overthinking it or trying to find nuggets of important info with guides will just make it harder. I'm saying this as someone who was Windows only until a few years ago. I didn't need to know what DEs or WMs were until I wanted to interact with them, so overwhelming a newbie with info dumps will probably just dissuade them from using Linux.

Right now, I highly recommend Neon right over those two other distros for beginners and I'll explain why.

LMDE is fine but it uses Cinnamon as its DE, which is only really used in LM and therefore has a lot of idiosyncrasies that make it hard to compare to more popular DEs like Plasma and Gnome. A lot of people recommend LM for beginners but I feel like that's a big mistake predicated on it being the most like Windows.

Kubuntu is fine but it uses Snaps for its packages, which are unique to Ubuntu and, again, have their own idiosyncrasies compared to Deb packages or Flatpaks. It kinda sets newbies up for that ecosystem which I think is a bad way to learn.

Neon is my recommendation because it ships with the (mostly) sensible defaults of Ubuntu, but uses Deb packages and Flatpaks instead of Snaps. It also uses Plasma as its DE which is great for beginners but also extremely flexible, deep, and popular. Only downside is that a new major version of Plasma just released so there may be bugs, but from my experience using it for a few months the only ones I've encountered are minor visual ones that usually resolve themselves.

+1 for Linux Mint for the power user. They will fell familiar and can start their journey from there. The most important concept I would explain would be package managers and flat pack, as in vanilla Windows there is no such thing.

The second one would be regular updates and that you have to do a little maintenance from time to time

Mint would be my recommendation for the noob as well. It is a clean distro and does not require a lot of maintenance except regular updates.

The best guide is learning the skills needed to solve problems. Both people already have those, the power user probably knows how to get windows to do what they want and the other person probably figured out how to get the results they need without finagling as much with the computer.

It’s never too late to learn something new and the “man” and “info” commands are a huge help!

Fedora, Ubuntu, Opensuse, Debian. Everything else are just derivatives.

I found the arch wiki to be helpful.

I just went through and tried out a lot of stuff in VMs and live USBs, and switched to an actual install when I got confident enough/was tired of USB boot speeds

maybe it's just me but I find just doing things myself much more fun and useful than reading guides

i just started out with whatever distro looked the best in promotional pics, which was kde neon in my case (kde neon <3)

imo it's more important to go with the interesting option (things like kde neon) than the easy option like Mint, at least it's what gave me the motivation to try things out and learn Linux

The answer to both is Mint.

I’m a noob so I don’t have a guide, but I went with EndeavourOS with KDE Plasma, and it’s been going mostly fine. It’s an Arch distro, so far seems fairly lightweight & no frills or hiccups. It also comes with an Nvidia install option for people with Nvidia GPUs.

they should just install it in a VM and check it out. it might help to point out what man pages and the texinfo manual are and that there's some docs in /usr/share/doc/

Are there any good resources for helping someone getting into Linux?

Do we feel the need to provide resources when one makes the switch from Android to iOS or vice versa? Or how about Windows to macOS or vice versa? Exactly, we don't. Don't get me wrong; I'm with you on the fact that those platforms (by virtue of their deals with vendors) are able to provide more streamlined experiences. However, I'd argue we've finally reached a critical level of 'polish' that should enable your average Joe to engage with Linux without hell breaking loose. The only questions that remain are; Which distro to recommend? AND What further advice do we give them?

The question of which distro is very, very important; first impression and all that*. I'd argue that a whole bunch of distros simply are not suited. (Almost) all of the independent (upstream) distros (so that would be Arch, Debian, Fedora and openSUSE) know who their audiences are and see (understandably so) absolutely no reason to change their respective installations to be a lot more cumbersome for the sake of improving the experiences of a couple of lost newbies. And I haven't even mentioned how some of them outright can't even deal with some particular issues that involve proprietary blobs/drivers and what not due to fear of court. Furthermore, our desired distro has to be ridiculously popular, function very reminiscent to other popular operating systems and be very predictable. Hence, it's unsurprising that we find in this spot our standard distros for newbs: Linux Mint, Pop!_OS and Zorin OS. Between these, ultimately, I believe the impact of their respective desktop environment and/or UX on the (new) user should be the deciding factor. Beyond those, the (opinionated) images provided by Universal Blue are excellent. The exclusion of Ubuntu (or any of its flavors) is due to its conundrum/dilemma with Snaps and how they've been dealing with the issues that users are having. Don't get me wrong; I'm aware that some users don't experience any issues. However, often enough, they tend to make life a lot more difficult.

As for the advice we give them; they should regard it as more similar to their phones. They don't install random stuff found on the internet on their phones, right? So, they should not do so on Linux either. Furthermore, the included Software Store is their refuge whenever they need software that's not already readily available on their systems. Finally, in case they can't find something in there, they should refer to https://alternativeto.net/.

Perhaps something like

https://www.tutorialspoint.com/unix/index.htm

https://www.tutorialspoint.com/unix/unix-getting-started.htm

All guides are different. There are tons of parallel efforts.

I would in general avoid

• opinionated upstream (Ubuntu)
• too outdated packages (everything Debian, when not using Flatpaks)
• pretty unstable (Arch, Fedora Rawhide, Debian unstable/testing)

I tried a lot of distros, wanted to use KDE which was pretty bad until Plasma 6 to be honest. So always hopped and stayed with the distro where "just KDE breaks". Fedora Kinoite.

The distro upgrades are automatic and either fail or are not applied (atomic). The distro is premade and does not need changes, the base is as minimal as reasonably possible (even core apps are Flatpaks, to separate them from the base system).

But you can install some RPM packages, the exact same that you could install on other Fedora, external repos, COPR etc. The moment you install a single one, updates will take longer. I layer Librewolf, virt-manager and more without issues, and updates are in the background.

As the system is so modular, uBlue came to life. They ship base images but also highly opinionated ones. I always used kinoite-main, which is just the Fedora base with minimal changes and especially included restricted codecs. Currently trying Aurora, which has more fancy stuff. Bazzite is the one you can use for possibly the best Gaming experience on Linux, Chris Titus made a video about that.

Bazzite is pretty similar to Nobara I think, with the difference that they dont disable SELinux (lol) and use the way more stable rpm-ostree, so they will simply not break.

You also always have an entire snapshot when updating, not just a kernel. So you can always reset to the past version.

You can make a manual snapshot of a specific version, also before a version upgrade etc. These stay there forever until you remove them again.

The interface is easy but there is no GUI yet. Wouldnt be that hard to do, I think that would be a cool Qt/Kirigami project.

And if you still have strange bugs, you can reset, this means all the custom changes (installs, uninstalls, ...) will be removed and you get the current Fedora base install without modifications.

This is simply unique, as this is otherwise only possible with a reinstall. The moment you start modifying a "traditional" distros base, you are pretty irreversibly different from upstream.

Its pretty scary, and with Atomic Fedora I basically dont plan on reinstalling ever again.