this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
271 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18068 readers
5020 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Weeks after winning a school board seat in her deeply red Texas county, Courtney Gore immersed herself in the district’s curriculum, spending her nights and weekends poring over hundreds of pages of lesson plans that she had fanned out on the coffee table in her living room and even across her bed. She was searching for evidence of the sweeping national movement she had warned on the campaign trail was indoctrinating schoolchildren.

Gore, the co-host of a far-right online talk show, had promised that she would be a strong Republican voice on the nonpartisan school board. Citing “small town, conservative Christian values,” she pledged to inspect educational materials for inappropriate messages about sexuality and race and remove them from every campus in the 7,700-student Granbury Independent School District, an hour southwest of Fort Worth. “Over the years our American Education System has been hijacked by Leftists looking to indoctrinate our kids into the ‘progressive’ way of thinking, and yes, they’ve tried to do this in Granbury ISD,” she wrote in a September 2021 Facebook post, two months before the election. “I cannot sit by and watch their twisted worldview infiltrate Granbury ISD.”

But after taking office and examining hundreds of pages of curriculum, Gore was shocked by what she found — and didn’t find.

The pervasive indoctrination she had railed against simply did not exist. Children were not being sexualized, and she could find no examples of critical race theory, an advanced academic concept that examines systemic racism. She’d examined curriculum related to social-emotional learning, which has come under attack by Christian conservatives who say it encourages children to question gender roles and prioritizes feelings over biblical teachings. Instead, Gore found the materials taught children “how to be a good friend, a good human.”

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dohpaz42 110 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’m cynical, so when I say I’m impressed by her ability to both do the hard work of pouring over that much data, and admitting that there was no evidence supporting g her claims, I mean it. I’m thoroughly impressed. I hope she serves as an example to others on how to do the right thing.

And what this post doesn’t highlight from the article, is that she went against her party’s narrative and spoke out about the truth.

Gore rushed to share the news with the hard-liners who had encouraged her to run for the seat. She expected them to be as relieved and excited as she had been. But she said they were indifferent, even dismissive, because “it didn’t fit the narrative that they were trying to push.”

So, in the spring of 2022, Gore went public with a series of Facebook posts. She told residents that her backers were using divisive rhetoric to manipulate the community’s emotions. They were interested not in improving public education but rather in sowing distrust, Gore said.

“I’m over the political agenda, hypocrisy bs,” Gore wrote. “I took part in it myself. I refuse to participate in it any longer. It’s not serving our party. We have to do better.”

There is more, of course, so if you have t read the full article, go read it.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree with you, generally.

The hard part is convincing every other alt-right winger. They aren't convinced by research and facts.

Ironically, it's their feelings that matter more and since they "feel" like indoctrination is happening, it must be true.

"The damn libs must have given her fake curriculums."

Or "She just got bought by the deep state."

Or "Now SHE'S going to indoctrinate the kids!"

[–] dohpaz42 10 points 1 month ago

Sadly, you’re absolutely right: there will always be some excuse as to why she’s (and the “libs” are) wrong and they’re right. We are an unapologetic society hellbent on blaming the other guy for the problems we caused ourselves.

[–] Delusional 63 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah no shit. Everyone who hasn't been brainwashed by conservative opinion stations knows that they're straight up lying about that shit. They straight up lie about a ton of shit to get more money and power and there are still millions of Americans that fall for their constant, daily lies. It's a real shame that no one is doing anything to stop them because their constant lies will contribute to the downfall of America eventually. Yet supposedly their lying and damage they cause to Americans is protected under "free speech."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

End the bullshit thinking that corporations are people... They have no "inalienable" rights, only the rights we give them. No right to free speech, and make companies responsible for anything they broadcast.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and she could find no examples of critical race theory

gotta be tough for these people to find something they can't define

[–] geekworking 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Actually, if you just embrace ignorance, the answer is simple.

Everything you don't like is the thing that you don't really understand.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

That sounds like woke. Stop doing a woke or else I'm gonna first-amendment your rights away with my Brandon diaper.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Instead, Gore found the materials taught children “how to be a good friend, a good human.”

Honestly, I can respect this. It'd be much easier to pull a Trump and claim that you fixed something that was never an issue by doing absolutely nothing, but she actually went through with it and admitted that she couldn't find the issues she was looking for.

It kinda goes to show that there are actually sincere people (albeit ones that still tend to have disagreeable stances) on the right that just keep getting tricked by the grifters and conmen that won't just bury their heads in the sand when something doesn't fit their narrative.

The optimist wants to believe that makes up a lot of them, but the realist in me isn't so sure.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

Gore rushed to share the news with the hard-liners who had encouraged her to run for the seat. She expected them to be as relieved and excited as she had been. But she said they were indifferent, even dismissive, because “it didn’t fit the narrative that they were trying to push.”

So, in the spring of 2022, Gore went public with a series of Facebook posts. She told residents that her backers were using divisive rhetoric to manipulate the community’s emotions. They were interested not in improving public education but rather in sowing distrust, Gore said.

“I’m over the political agenda, hypocrisy bs,” Gore wrote. “I took part in it myself. I refuse to participate in it any longer. It’s not serving our party. We have to do better.”

Agreed.

[–] 2piradians 34 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Good for her. Now the voters she duped with fearmongering, most of whom haven't gone over the curriculum themselves, probably won't learn that she found nothing. They'll probably credit her for eliminating what was never there.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

If they think that's impressive, they should hear about the time I saved my nephew from the sabre-tooth cat that lived under his bed with nothing but a laser forcefield and a big hug and kiss.

[–] testfactor 8 points 1 month ago

To be fair, if you read the article, it seems like it completely changed her tune, and she's super supportive of the current policies now.

She's getting a ton of backlash from her former supporters.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

In that case, they accidentally end up with a politician with some actual decency. I was imagining they’d vote in a less honest fear monger.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

They and she will vote exactly the same the next time around anyway, so it really doesn't matter if they learn the truth or not.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ok, but who is she voting for next election? You can say "you see the light now" all day, but if you keep voting for liars, have you really changed all that much?

[–] Rekhyt 13 points 1 month ago

You clearly didn't read the article. She specifically endorsed the candidate for the school board that she ousted previously. She's speaking against the party line. There is a real shift that happened for her, and her actions speak to it.

[–] MapleEngineer 21 points 1 month ago

According to Gore, Criswell also pressured her to stop speaking with all of her fellow school board members, except for Graft. “They’re just lying to you. They’re not your friends,” she recalled him saying.

Cult much?

[–] unreasonabro 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

looks like all your sources of "news" are in fact infotainment! Congratulations, now you can join the rest of us out here in reality, trying to deal with all your former fucking friends. Right? ... right?

crickets