Isn't the crux of his defense that it isn't true, so he wouldn't have bothered paying for her silence, and Cohen did it on his own?
this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
152 points (100.0% liked)
politics
17996 readers
4076 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That's the defense, but the prosecution is attempting to build a case that it is true, that the monies moved, and were subsequently misreported on statutory filings.
That last bit is the actual crux of it. Whether the deed was a crime or not, it's the coverup that gets you the time.
That last bit is the actual crux of it. Whether the deed was a crime or not, it’s the coverup that gets you the time.
The coverup gets you the time because in this case he's being charged with 34 counts of falsifying business records, not for paying a pornstar as part of an NDA.
I can almost see Trump's point on this though - the specific details of their sexual encounter (like whether or not he used a condom) are more or less irrelevant to what he's charged with. That the sexual encounter occurred and that she was being paid not to disclose it is the only really relevant part from her.
She didn't go into details tho. Her story is absolutely valid to give legitimacy to her claims he paid her to shut up.
The crux of the defense is "nuh-uh" and to delay ideally until Trump can pardon himself or he dies.
He can "demand" whatever he wants. What he's gonna get is a fair trial, followed by a verdict from a jury of his peers.
And that's the last thing he wants, because he's so fucking guilty.
You just triggered a thought that 12 people now have to say they're Trump's peer
But they didn't object to it during the testimony because they wanted to argue for a mistrial