this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
148 points (97.4% liked)

Nostalgia

1351 readers
1 users here now

nostalgia noun nos·tal·gia nä-ˈstal-jə nə-, also nȯ-, nō-; nə-ˈstäl- 1: a wistful or excessively sentimental yearning for return to or of some past period or irrecoverable condition also : something that evokes nostalgia

Rules for Nostalgia Lemmy Community

1. Respectful Nostalgia Share nostalgic content and memories respectfully. Avoid offensive or insensitive references that may be hurtful to others.

2. Relevant Nostalgia Posts should focus on nostalgic content, including memories, media, and cultural references from the past. Stay on topic to preserve the nostalgic theme of the community.

3. Source Verification If you share nostalgic media or content, provide accurate sources or background information when possible.

4. No Spamming Avoid excessive posting of similar nostalgic topics to keep content diverse and engaging for all members.

5. Positive Discussions Encourage positive discussions and interactions related to nostalgic topics. Respect different viewpoints and memories shared by community members.

6. Quality Content Strive to post high-quality content that sparks nostalgia and meaningful conversations among members.

7. Moderation Guidelines

By adhering to these rules and guidelines, we can create a welcoming and enjoyable space to relive nostalgic moments together. If you have any questions or suggestions, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for sharing your nostalgia responsibly!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmit.online/post/2823781

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/nostalgia by /u/brolbo on 2024-05-03 00:24:21.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chemical_cutthroat 44 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Hell yeah. Government inspected beef.

[–] chetradley 13 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

if it ain't government cheese I'm not interested

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] chemical_cutthroat 2 points 6 months ago

Your local recruitment office. They'll inspect your meat and give you a free haircut.

[–] niktemadur 1 points 6 months ago

That's my fetish

[–] [email protected] 38 points 6 months ago (2 children)

That looks like a decent burger.

$0.39 in 1965 is $3.90 today.

[–] Zekas 20 points 6 months ago (3 children)

And costs 50% more today still. Woooo

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago

And tastes like something from burger king

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

only 50% more than it 'should'? they're more than double the inflation-adjusted price here--just for the burger.

[–] pigup 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hey man, pink slime and Mexican vegetables are expensive ok???

[–] Zekas 3 points 6 months ago

I don't even live in the US, price is the same anyway

[–] NegativeInf 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Whopper is 5.49 sandwich only rn when I check the closest one in their app. Texas for context.

[–] Anticorp 7 points 6 months ago

Which means it is actually more expensive, since they raised their prices for anyone not using the app.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 24 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Uhhhhh….. what’s in the “coke”?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Sugar. Cocaine version was long gone by now

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Oh I know, but if I came up and asked if you wanted a "coke" with air quotes, I'm sure you'd be a bit suspicious!

[–] homesweethomeMrL 1 points 6 months ago

Once upon a time, they used the “whole” name. So Coke is in quotes because, hey - it’s kicky! And fun! Let’s all say “Coke” and lift our brand engagement! The kids will really “go” for that!

[–] numberfour002 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Even with the faded coloring, that burger looks at least an order of magnitude more appealing than the last Whopper I've seen. Granted, it's probably been 10 - 15 years since I've been to or eaten food from a Burger King, and things might've changed.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

I haven't been there in awhile either, but I don't remember them toasting their buns.

[–] trolololol 1 points 6 months ago

It has changed for better. You gotta believe me🤣🤣🤣

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago

For me it's $5.59 for one today... let's play with this...

Let's say this was 1969. $0.39 adjusted to 2024 dollars is $3.32 according to CPI.

At $0.39, and a minimum wage of $1.30/hr, that earns you 3.33 whoppers per hour.

At $5.59, and a minimum wage of $7.25/hr, that earns you 1.3 whoppers per hour.

If minimum wage kept in line with the cost of the whopper it would be $18.63/hr

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

When they didn't fake pictures in ads

[–] Zekas 41 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Actually that's outlawed, the trickery starts surrounding what's being sold.

FTC laws state that whatever you're selling with a photo must be real in the image. To use a familiar example, if you're selling corn flakes the flakes must be real. But then it gets interesting. You can use white glue instead of milk in your bowl of flakes because you're not selling the milk, only the corn flakes."

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (2 children)

God we live in a clownworld.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

"Here's $500 to say we don't."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

make that a monthly subscription and i will continue not to say it

[–] homesweethomeMrL 1 points 6 months ago

Attaboy. Here’s your bicycle horn.

[–] Nindelofocho 2 points 6 months ago

Ill play a little devils advocate here. You ever try to take multiple product shots of some foods and have it look good for the whole photoshoot? Cereal especially, its gunna get soggy, the milk will have bits of the cereal that have broken off floating around or itll start to get discolored. Not to mention that milk will be sitting under hot studio lamps for at least as long as the photoshoot goes which can go on for a grip there will be thousands of shots from multiple angles, same shots with the lighting moved around and changed and not to mention the photoshoots are usually of multiple products or the same product with different platings/bowls/etc so theres gotta be an inventory of of these products ready to swap out without them being disturbed. Photographers that tend to do the big stuff also tend to be very passionate and very serious about it as photography is an art form after all. As a consumer I would prefer honest representation of the product to be shown but as a photographer I do understand wanting to get the best look of the product and I know my 3am 2nd bowl of cereal isint ever gunna look like the picture on the box.

Fun fact: Ice that is usually always depicted in beverages is not actually ice but rather a gelatin or some other gelatinous material that wont melt under the lights this is true in movies too because you dont want ice clinking in glasses while actors are trying to have a conversation. And the frosting effect you usually see thats not CG effects is usually some form of aerosolised glue. Its actually fascinating all the effects that you can do to make stuff look a certain way in studio conditions without the use of CG

[–] niktemadur 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Or they can take their time to assemble a perfect looking burger with tweezers if need be, lit and photographed or filmed by the best technicians in the ad business.

It's not a lie by legal standards, but it definitely is deceptive.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Catsup? . . . . Ketchup.

Ketchup? . . . . Catsup.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago

Hey kid, want a "coke?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

“Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese” … oh, wait …

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Back when they laid out what was in the special sauce.