this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
839 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

55655 readers
4231 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I hope that's a wakeup call to all the other automakers who announced plans to switch from CCS to NAC"S"

Big fucking mistake basing future plans on that company

[–] jj4211 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well, not necessarily.

Short term, they dramatically increased access to credible fast charging.

Longer term, near as I can tell, third party NACS fast charging will commence. So while this may be a disaster for Tesla and the Tesla charging network per se, long term it has room for another company to come along and displace Tesla.

If such a company were looking for a team to drive such an initiative, it seems we all know where to find one now...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Why does it matter? The standard is now open and can be used by everyone. It's just like CCS now from a usability pov but with many more chargers

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Thorndike 25 points 2 months ago

Ahhh, the trustworthy test. Sounds like the same type of test that Trump plans to use in his hiring process. Coincidence? I think not. All part of the fascist playbook.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's a ton of software running on these chargers, right? They need to handle financial transactions, metadata, etc. What happens when something requires maintenance in a month/week/day?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EdibleFriend 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The electric car company who spent years pissing off liberals is faling? whodathunkit

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah to this day I don't understand this "genius" business move. My redneck conservative dad sure as hell isn't buying an electric vehicle anytime soon, even if you put a giant MAGA hat on it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EarMaster 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Oh Tesla gets the Twitter treatment. At that rate it will be renamed X within the next 7 months. Better make sure X (formerly known as Twitter) has been terminated by then otherwise they have to sue each other...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, this can only end well ...

[–] homesweethomeMrL 13 points 2 months ago

I mean . . this is the end. Everything after this is just paperwork and scrabbling for scraps.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One bad quarter and they're doing this? I don't even.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

The company is pretty much a big scam. There’s a reason why Moskovitz calls it the next Enron. Musk would turn it into a crypto company if he thought it would pump up the stock more. As a result, the actual business side of Tesla doesn’t really need to work.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (8 children)

No longer a car company then…

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Resonosity 12 points 2 months ago

I wonder what this means this for the SAE and USDOT adopting the Tesla charging network and connector as standard for future EV development.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›