this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
289 points (94.7% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6757 readers
905 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 50 points 7 months ago (4 children)

What’s going on here?

Is that how fighter planes are born?

[–] yesman 51 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sometimes when a defense contractor and military branch love each other very much, they do a special hug, called an engineering and manufacturing development contract.

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 27 points 7 months ago

I thought the military–industrial complex fucks the taxpayers and two trillion dollars later (and five years past contract deadline) a multirole fighter pops out?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

A young F-35 being taught to fly for the first time

[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 7 points 7 months ago

Nature is beautiful, isn't it?

[–] RustyEarthfire 10 points 7 months ago

Testing helicopter capabilities.

CH-53K carrying an inoperable F-35C airframe (CF-1) refueling from a KC-130T

https://interestingengineering.com/photo-story/in-photos-us-powerful-helicopter-transports-f-35-airframe-while-refueling

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Helicopter transporting a jet getting midair refuel.

Not sure the context of why it had to happen though. Pilot flight hours?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Common question… the aircraft is an F-35, which has strong stealth capabilities. Because we had trouble tracking one that crashed in the US last year, congress dictated that each F-35 operated in the US would have an emotional support helicopter attached so that the radar signature of the helicopter could be tracked in case of emergency.

They initially tried tying the helicopter to the jet and operating it this way, but after three helicopters they decided the other way around was the best configuration (while losing helicopters is okay, there was concern the surviving pilots might get used to moving over 500mph, and this attitude could contaminate the other slow-moving helicopter pilots).

It’s a heavy price for safety, but honestly the F-35 pilots are too busy taking pictures of themselves in an F-35 to notice the difference.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I never thought that you refuel helicopters this way. Isn't the risk of the rotor snacking on the fuel line to high?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Damn hungry helicopters. Always eating my fuel lines!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Our best engineers are workshoping a solution

[–] DogWater 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The line will cut cleanly if it happens.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

With cleanly you mean without fringes? Can't Hape our helicopter showered in kerosine in a sloppy way

[–] Couldbealeotard 3 points 7 months ago

Yes, there are videos of this exact thing happening

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Actually Russia also laid claims to Alaska, so it's definitely not just European security.

(who is the western aid btw?)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

maple syrup land & george land

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Those new Super Duper Stallions are badass

(In the PS1 game Army Men Air Attack you could fly an armed Stallion gunship. I would love to see concept art of a irl version because that sounds rad as hell)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

yea sure if it wasn't for ukraine nato would have no chance at all against mighty mother russia

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

except in that case people from NATO countries would have to die, not to mention countries would have to spend their main military budget, also as all the countries' economy will be dedicated to prevail. Now they can just throw leftovers from now and then so that Ukraine can hold back Russia. Well, till there are any ukrainians left of course.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Or, just maybe, NATO members are mostly worried about the "Nuclear Armageddon" aspect.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago