this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024

135 points (97.9% liked)

News

23649 readers

4576 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

135

U.S. birth rate drops to record low, ending pandemic uptick - CBS Detroit (www.cbsnews.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/news

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The pace of babies born each year in the U.S. has slowed to a new record low, according to an analysis of 2023 birth certificate data published Thursday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Last year's slowdown marks an official end to the uptick in new babies that began during the COVID-19 pandemic. At least 3,591,328 babies were born in the U.S. in 2023, down 2% from the 3,667,758 born in 2022.

all 20 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] pdxfed 52 points 8 months ago (2 children)

As the article points out, US has been below replacement birthrate(2.1 children per woman) since 1971. Immigration is the only reason the US has continued to have a growing population since that time.

1.6 is bad but many industrial countries have the same issue--only they don't have strong immigration draw(or don't allow it) to fall back on. East Asia (Japan, South Korea and now China), as well as southern European countries (Portugal, Spain, Italy) have had crushingly low birth rates for years.

Social programs, entitlements and politics are incredibly affected.

At the end of the day, people are being worked so much and are so stressed they can't enjoy or don't want to entertain bringing a new life into what for many countries is a vicious cycle of exploitation.

[–] disguy_ovahea 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There was also a sharp decline since 2008, due to the financial crisis.

The obvious solution is to force American women to keep unwanted children against their will, rather than implementing streamlined immigration reform.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

And step 2 is to shame them for having children if they can't afford them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The rest of that solution is to ban any kind of birth control a woman might choose on her own.

[–] buzz86us 5 points 8 months ago

Then we have to make child care so unaffordable they will never see their child..

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago

For my wife and I, our decision to not have kids came early in our marriage. We've never been super well off, but we get by. There have been times where we have had trouble paying rent. Neither one of us can imagine trying to just afford a child, much less raise one.

[–] Diplomjodler3 38 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The solution is obviously to take away womens' bodily autonomy.

[–] Ultragigagigantic 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

The 1% can make their own wage slaves.

The next time you pay monthly tribute to your landed lord, really savor the moment. I bet your kids are just tickled pink to pay to exist, just like you right?

Thanks mom and dad, a fucking bill!

Reproduction is child abuse.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Luckily, my flat (in Germany) is owned by the city so I'm kind of paying myself?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Good. Less strain on the environment, more homes available, upward pressure on wages.

[–] iuser 6 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Is this a bad thing?

[–] Diplomjodler3 13 points 8 months ago

Of course! How are the oligarchs going to get richer if there are no plebes to exploit?

[–] Theharpyeagle 3 points 8 months ago

In our lifetimes at least, yes. An aging population means more people who need help and less people to supply it. We all need more help as we get older, and we're already facing staff shortages for geriatric care. And of course if you're in the US, there's genuine fear of SS not being available once we're eligible to use it.

We could probably change course and mitigate these issues by increasing pay for Healthcare workers to incentivise taking care of the elderly, reducing or eliminating student debt so more people can seek higher education in Healthcare, improved access to Healthcare to prevent problems while we're young so they don't catch up with us when we're old, and easier paths to legal immigration so we can bolster our population while continuing to collect taxes for more robust social programs. But that probably won't happen because the people in charge are too old and/or wealthy to ever be affected by this kind of thing.

[–] ChapulinColorado 3 points 8 months ago

No.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

If you want ~~ponzi schemes~~ pay as you go systems like social security and Medicare to work it's a terrible thing.