this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
644 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

9223 readers
2427 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/8569504

How is the hydrogen made?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 243 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (52 children)

To save you all a google: it's made from natural gas, at a pretty significant energy loss compared to just burning the gas. It generates about 4 times more co2 than burning diesel.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] FuglyDuck 14 points 2 months ago

Time to arm the swans and Canada geese, too.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 2 months ago (5 children)

That is true of all colours of hydrogen other than green (and possibly natural stores of 'fossil' hydrogen if they can be extracted without leakage).

Green hydrogen is better thought of as a battery than a fuel. It's a good way to store the excess from renewables and may be the only way to solve problems like air travel.

How hydrogen is transforming these tiny Scottish islands

That's not to say it's perfect. Hydrogen in the atmosphere slows down the decomposition of methane so leaks must be kept well below 5% or the climate benefits are lost. We don't have a good way to measure leaks. It's also quite inefficient because a lot of energy is needed to compress it for portable uses.

And, of course, the biggest problem is that Big Carbon will never stop pushing for dirtier hydrogens to be included in the mix, if green hydrogen paves the way.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 months ago

Storing hydrogen is also really hard. It needs to be kept extremely cold, and when it isn't, it tends to pass right through most storage units.

But as a local battery, it can be very useful. Or for applications in large machinery where batteries aren't a useful option yet.

[–] MashedTech 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If the leaks of hydrogen should be kept under 5%, we don't have a good track record of keeping gas leaks under control anyway...

https://youtu.be/K2oL4SFwkkw?si=Kn-uO64U4X5B_szD

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

Yes. I'm not watching a video but it is a serious problem, especially as hydrogen degrades metals and finds its way out anyway. The private sector cannot be trusted to self-regulate nor the government to meaningfully regulate.

Trying very hard not to succumb to nihilism here ...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

And better yet, if the excess heat can be used. Last Friday i heard a sales rep from a (green) hydrogen company describe their solution as a heating solution that produce hydrogen at an energy storage conference. Seems fair to me😊

[–] Eatspancakes84 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I really don’t get why hydrogen remains popular. Hydrogen is significantly less efficient than lithium batteries in storing electricity. There are currently dozens of technologies on the way for improving batteries beyond what’s possible with lithium. So what’s the market potential for green hydrogen again?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It wins by a huge margin on the energy to weight ratio. In scenarios where weight doesn't matter it's dumb, but there is potential in places like air travel where it does make sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Batteries are too heavy for many applications (including, arguably, cars).

That doesn't make hydrogen the only solution but it is at least a currently available solution. I posted a link about why the Orkneys (population 23k) are producing hydrogen and switching much of their transport to it: they have so much wind the UK (population 70m) national grid can't take all the power they generate from it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh great, and I was wondering why some of our policians were pushing hydrogen cars as an alternative to electric cars, despite even the car industry telling them to shut the fuck up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (49 replies)
[–] the_of_and_a_to 61 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Never forget bp started the „personal co2 footprint“ propaganda

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Which, I'm all for us all reducing our footprint too, but knowing that at the same time we should be matching oil and gas executives through the streets for old fashioned tar and feathering at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Maybe we should hit them back with the corporate co2 footprint

Lets calculate the amount of pollution divided by the amount of employees

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 months ago

You know, when a proton and electron love each other very much...

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You can make hydrogen greenly with electricity and electrolysis. But I doubt BP is doing that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Hydrogen was made approximately 400,000 after the big bang in a process called recombination, as the universe cooled down enough for stable neutral atoms to exist.

[–] FuglyDuck 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Attack geese.

I'd normally suggest that attack geese are against geneva conventions or something... but these guys.... they got it coming.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (5 children)

They aren't legal combatants, it's all fine.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (4 children)

OMFG that thread is full of people missing the point.

[–] marcos 5 points 2 months ago

You mean the people literally answering the question? I doubt anybody is missing the point.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

first you'd have to purify water by distilling it and then putting it through an R.O. with a regular water filter as a pre-filter.

Then once you have that completely pure mix of hydrogen and oxygen you'd need to do electrolysis on the water. But that initial purifying process would have to be done very strictly, because if there's even the smallest amount of salt or even chlorine in that water, or any other minerals then you could have a mixture of some very dangerous elements in the air around the water

load more comments
view more: next ›