this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
242 points (99.2% liked)

World News

39113 readers
2413 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Good. I'd much rather look at this than the gaping hole of some old abandoned coal mine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Do I have some news for you: https://gravitricity.com/

They use surplus energy to pull up weights and lower them when energy is in demand, using the principle of a grandfather clock. They are using abandoned mine shafts because they are readily available for this purpose.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In 1 points 7 months ago

That method doesn't scale. 1 ton raised 1m gets you 12m in an electric car.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, that's awesome!

[–] blackfire 16 points 7 months ago

There are so many other Quarry's and coal mines this could be done to. It would actually save the mine companies money as they don't have to fully return the space to nature.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I always wonder how resilient are these solar parks when a big hailstorm comes. There were some really large storms in Germany in the last couple of years and they caused really serious damage in the cities.

[–] BrightCandle 12 points 7 months ago

Its a major design consideration and they do survive hailstorms. There are always going to be freak events with very big hail that they don't survive but if you have one of those its not just the solar panels its everyones cars and windows and anything else remotely breakable in the area as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm all for it, but with plants of this size - or rather such an mount of relatively dense photovoltaic surfaces - i am thinking about the heat that these panels are generating. i am guessing it would be similar to such an area out of asphalt. if these panels were cooled the heat could also be used to warm massive heat storage tanks.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

And by piping water to the back of the panel to cool it you make the panel operate more efficiently.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not even enough to go back to the future.

[–] Brickhead92 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's too late to go back to the future. The future was in 2015.

[–] credo 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is it correct to say the future was in the past, or is in the past?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Yes. The Germans have a tense for it: Futur II.

Use Futur II (= ich werde gelernt haben) to make assumptions about something that has happened in the past or will have already happened by a certain time in the future.

[–] jaybone 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] T156 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Cool cool cool cool cool… what’s photovoltaic?

[–] Waldhuette 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Solar cells that generate electricity

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Exactly as it sounds then! Thanks for spelling it out for me!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

PhotoVoltaic

[–] SlopppyEngineer 1 points 7 months ago (4 children)

All with Chinese panels I assume

[–] TheFonz 18 points 7 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Fear mongering about China seemingly has no end. Even their solar panels have some nefarious purpose, apparently.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Probably network connected and they all phone home to Chinese IP addresses about usage and other data.

Am I doing it right?

[–] Specal 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They're scared they're gonna have china spyware that steals the sun

[–] jaybone 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Is Chinese spyware not a thing that exists? Is it only crazy conspiracy theorists that believe in this stuff, and so we should mock them?

Because if it was a real problem, this would be a good way to silence the criticism.

[–] Specal 1 points 7 months ago

Of course it exists, so does US spyware, German spyware, British spyware Turkish spyware.

I mock people because they think China are trying to figure out what cereal they eat. It's rational to have concerns, it's irrational to only be concerned about China.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Well, kinda a problem if your objective was to not depend on dictatorships for energy

[–] Specal 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Strange, didn't know that was in the renewable objective brief. I thought It was about reducing reliance on fossil fuels, not sticking it to chyna, silly me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Thing is there are german manufactures.

[–] Specal 1 points 7 months ago

That can't compete anymore because the German government removed subsidies

[–] [email protected] 14 points 7 months ago

Better decarbonise with Chinese panels than keep burning fossil fuels.

[–] ikidd 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

If you want to beat the Chinese at solar panels, you need to go back about ten years and find a couple million workers that will take $2/hr to make them.

I'll look forward to updates on your progress towards this goal.

Australia sounds like it's about to donate $2B to some grifters that are going to pretend they can do this domestically. They'll take the money, produce nothing and live happily ever after.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Solar module production isn't labour-intensive, much less intensive in low-skill labour.

A bit more than a decade ago, Germany was the #1 producer of solar panels, drastically pushing down prices with advances in technology, manufacturing, and automation. Then the government decided to slash all subsidies (mostly about capping feed-in tariffs for solar), without warning, and without phase-out. Noone was prepared for that kind of thing so all the companies went belly-up and the Chinese swooped in, buying the tech for cheap with money borrowed from the Chinese taxpayer and began to produce panels and sell them, again subsidised by state coffers. We later slapped them with anti-dumping tariffs but by then the domestic industry was already decomposing.

It'd stiff be cost-effective to build solar panels in Germany, the degree of automation is so high that higher wages balance out with higher transportation costs.

Australia though don't get me started on Australia you're structurally a 3rd world economy reliant on export of raw goods. You're not even smelting that ore, just shovelling it onto ships.

[–] Waldhuette 5 points 7 months ago

Still better than nuclear fuel refined in Russia. Or gas from Russia.