this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
192 points (91.4% liked)

politics

19142 readers
3398 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
outrageousmatter
aidan
jordanlund
HLMenckenFan
little_cow
192
Thirty years ago the world failed to stop the Rwandan genocide. Now we fail Gaza (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by Linkerbaan to c/politics
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The 100 days of killing that became known as the Rwandan genocide began on 7 April 1994. Hutu extremists murdered about 800,000 Tutsis while major powers, led by the US, found reasons not to save them.

Even as evidence of the atrocities mounted, Bill Clinton ordered his own staff not to call the killings a genocide, because that would have drawn political and legal pressures for US intervention, and blocked the United Nations security council from sending troops to stop the slaughter.

The US wasn’t alone. French soldiers in Rwanda rescued foreigners and their pets but did nothing to save ordinary Tutsis. Instead, France indulged its colonialist fantasies about regions of influence and sought to prop up the Hutu extremist government leading the genocide.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Carmakazi 30 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Attempt to genocide an entire people, nothing meaningful happens.

Attempt to disrupt the global oil supply, the West puts together a 42-nation military coalition to go and push your shit in.

Human lives sadly have little value in realpolitik.

[–] billiam0202 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Russia's invasion of Ukraine disrupted the global oil supply, and yet the US has done comparatively little (so to speak) to stop it.

Probably because it's an election year, and also that a significant portion of one political party supports Russia.

[–] Carmakazi 6 points 7 months ago

You're not wrong, but tackling a nuclear power like Russia probably takes more nuance than taking on Saddam or Milosevic.

The Republicans definitely tie our hands even on measured responses, and I hope history remembers them as the degenerate traitors they are.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Genocide is a noun. Example: You don’t dinner your guests. You feed them dinner.

[–] Zehzin 2 points 7 months ago

I'm gonna locker you

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago

They failed the initial test

[–] Cypher 4 points 7 months ago

The international reaction to Rwanda was informed by the disastrous peacekeeping attempt in Somalia which was initiated in December 1992.

There was no political will amongst any nations to mire themselves in another costly and deadly intervention in Africa.

To point the finger at the US and allies is to ignore the historical and political context in which these events occurred.