A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
“All I can say is that we did not receive any positive feedback on the addition from visitors to the gallery,”
Not a strong debut and I understand why museum did this but they're pursuing charges fir drilling 2 holes in a wall? The corporate mentality for an art institution is so cringe.
Most likely they couldn't figure out anything else to charge him hence the "drilling the wall" thing.
Sounds like they didn't get any complaints either.
I'm sure it has a lot more to do with discouraging others from giving it a go.
Maybe they didn't like the guy and jumped at the occasion.
That painting will be part of a special exhibition in a couple of decades.
The Pinakothek spokesperson said the painting had been hung in the early hours and spotted by staff soon after the museum opened the same day.
For some reason I was really hoping he got away with it for a little while.
No pictures of painting. BOOOOOO! 🤣
So this one time I snuck into a corporate building in Spokane and hung artwork in a tucked-away hallway off of the lobby. I forgot about it until a couple years later and it was all still there.
It honestly sounds like a really good idea to get your art out into the world.
Or it means no one has really noticed it in all the years it was there.
More likely this 😇
I’d love to see the painting.
You're telling me they didn't include it in the article? In 2024?
I'm shocked, I tell you. SHOCKED.
I mean, the dude did it so he could get eyes on his work. So that would be basically giving him exactly what he wanted.
And?
No and then
they're going for criminal charges due to 'willful damage of property'
that is some fuckin bullshit, two small drill holes and you want criminal action??? fuck off
Doesn't surprise me.
The art "community" is full of assholes just sucking off those who have wealth.
If this guy cashed out without buying in, that wouldn't be good for the people profiting off of art and the useful idiots gawking at it.
Wonder if he's a fan of Tom Green
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
https://piped.video/aQvGIIdgFDM
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.