this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2024
-44 points (18.6% liked)

politics

18082 readers
3741 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] uberdroog 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A goof who might throw the election, but it's hard right now to tell which way.

[–] uberdroog 1 points 3 months ago

I am pretty sure he was meant to be a poison pill for Democrats, and it backfired miraculously. The anti-vaxors switched sides. Crazy follows crazy.

[–] Rapidcreek 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps this is a good thing as it makes RFK more appealing to Trump voters.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

We can only hope, but polling shows him hurting Biden slightly more than Trump.

So make sure any of your acquaintances that might be on the fence about Biden know that Robby’s biggest donor is also one of Trumps bigger donors as well. It ties the wholes together even tighter.

[–] CharlesDarwin 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Eh, what? Does this bozo think he has a right to spew just whatever he wants on social media platforms?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

So what are this guy's qualifications outside of being named Kennedy?

[–] uberdroog 1 points 3 months ago

Are people down voting because they don't trust the source, find the information inaccurate or misleading, or because they just dislike RFKs statements? The latter may suppress things people should actually read...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


His argument made on CNN’s “Erin Burnett OutFront” centered around being blocked on social media platforms during the Biden administration, which he labeled as an effort to “censor political speech” and undermine the First Amendment.

In December, the Supreme Court blocked Kennedy from joining a challenge to a case brought by the Missouri and Louisiana’s attorneys general concerning the Biden administration’s communications with social media companies about posts the government views as disinformation.

“With a straight face Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said that Joe Biden is a bigger threat to democracy than Donald Trump because he was barred from pushing conspiracy theories online,” DNC senior adviser Mary Beth Cahill said in a statement.

He has never held office but has inspired a small contingent of supporters drawn to his advocacy against public health mandates and the influence of money on decisions made by government and private corporations.

Kennedy’s comments come after members of his extended family, including some of his siblings, celebrated St. Patrick’s Day at the White House last month and shared their support for Biden in a social media post.

Kennedy also downplayed concerns about playing the role of spoiler, arguing he believes neither Biden nor Trump will advance policy goals he wants prioritized, such as the national debt and the reduction of the US defense budget.


The original article contains 1,305 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm baffled that people think we have a democracy in the first place when politicians can be bought and own stock in the companies they regulate.

[–] HootinNHollerin 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Or get hired by them right after.

But what trump plans, that’s a violent fascist nightmare on top of all that corruption that we absolutely need to stamp out long ago