this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
277 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39021 readers
2433 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] requiem 59 points 7 months ago

Slightly misleading title, I was surprised that the Russians advanced to Kyiv with 36 tanks.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

Seems like this would be a good place to get rid of those end-of-life A10s.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Why were they were using so many tanks and so few armored personnel carriers? It must have been an extremely intense concentration of force to be like nahhhh let’s leave the APCs out of this and just use tanks.

Or maybe they just don’t have the spare APCs to use in an armored assault like this and don’t want to risk losing more?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

just use tanks

(ISW) said Kyiv’s forces repelled 36 tanks and 12 BMP infantry fighting vehicles

Probably just using IFVs instead of APCs, right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah I missed the IFV part but yeah that is kind of what I would think. I just keep conceptualizing armored assaults as using tanks to punch through a line specifically so that APCs can get through and exploit the opening and quickly maneuver troops into position behind enemy lines.

I guess when you are talking about the most intense, heavily defended parts of an enemies defenses though I guess you aren’t banking on punching through just smashing the other side back. Doesn’t seem very effective though, tanks always outrun infantry.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Ukraine has fought off 36 Russian tanks in the western Donetsk region, according to a think tank, in what is believed to have been one of Moscow’s biggest armoured vehicle assaults of the war.

Citing a Ukrainian serviceman, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said Kyiv’s forces repelled 36 tanks and 12 BMP infantry fighting vehicles as part of a Russian battalion-sized mechanised assault near the key town of Avdiivka in Donetsk Oblast on Saturday.

The ISW added that geolocated imagery shows a large number of destroyed and damaged Russian armored vehicles and tanks, with the Ukrainian serviceman reporting that Moscow lost at least 20 in the failed attack.

It comes as Kyiv’s military administration reported five hypersonic Zircon missiles are among the 180 weapons Russia has fired at the Ukrainian capital city since the start of this year.

Meanwhile, Russian shelling from Kharkiv to Lviv killed five people across Ukraine on Sunday.

Vladimir Putin’s forces launched 23 missile attacks and 61 airstrikes, as well as 41 attacks from multiple-launch rocket systems, Ukraine’s General Staff of the Armed Forces said.


The original article contains 195 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 7%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

I love to hear stories of an aggressor country's stuff getting blown up and destroyed.

[–] afraid_of_zombies 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I know I am not an expert at all on this stuff but 36 tanks doesn't sound like a lot. What am I missing?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

36 tanks is a substantial amount for a single assault. It was also the largest one since the initial invasion.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Maybe you've never been on the dangerous side of a tank before. They are a lot more threatening when they look directly at you.