this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
56 points (82.6% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3051 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tumnus 40 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Is this politics? Hunter Biden isn't a politician.

[–] simplejack 16 points 8 months ago

True. But the only reason people are paying this much attention to this case is because the GOP is trying to politicize stuff that shouldn’t have been political.

[–] givesomefucks 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Attorneys representing Hunter Biden asked a US judge in Los Angeles to dismiss the criminal case accusing him of evading $1.4m in taxes, arguing that prosecutors bowed to political pressure from Republican lawmakers investigating his father, Joe Biden.

Hunter’s lawyers appeared before the US district judge Mark Scarsi in federal court in Los Angeles on Wednesday to press several legal challenges to the charges, including an argument that he was selectively targeted by prosecutors in response to Republican criticism. The 54-year-old was not present in the courtroom.

He's arguing the only reason he's being held accountable is political...

Which is the same thing trump says.

It highlights a bigger issue that definitely is political:

The only time wealthy connected people are held accountable is for pissing off other wealthy connected people.

We need a system where bare minimum the exception is no accountability due to political connections instead of the current system where 99.9% percent of the wealthy can do this shit and no one cares.

It's one of the things progressives push for while republicans and "moderates" stop anything from being done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

Only if you are gullible enough to fall for the people muddying the waters. Is Hunter Biden being held to the same standard for his crime that other who did the same are vs is Trump.

Don’t let them think comparing apples to oranges is apples to apples.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

We need a system where bare minimum the exception is no accountability due to political connections instead of the current system where 99.9% percent of the wealthy can do this shit and no one cares.

The people certainly care, at least the ones that want justice and an even playing field, but there's nothing we can do about it because they're playing by a different set of rules, and that's what's total bullshit. If I don't pay my taxes, I'll get my ass handed to me, but if anyone connected doesn't, they wring their hands until it goes away.

I pay my taxes because it's the right thing to do (even though I vehemently disagree on what these knuckleheads spend it on), and I don't really have a choice anyway, so I'd rather stay out of trouble. The GOP is hanging on to this issue because it's the only real tangible thing they have to show any wrongdoing connected to Biden, and they're making a political spectacle where it doesn't exist. But it does highlight the issue of how wealthy people operate under a different paradigm than the rest of us. It's just rich coming from the party that grifts and cons like it's going out of style, while attempting to shield themselves by saying it's somehow different (it's not).

[–] givesomefucks -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The people certainly care,

But as long as we "vote blue no matter who" it'll never change.

And now that the DNC is canceling primaries and have been saying it doesn't matter because they can appoint whoever they want...

It's not enough to just vote in the primaries and hold our noses in the general.

We can't fix anything when both teams are ignoring what voters want.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

We can't fix anything when both teams are ~~ignoring what voters want.~~ representing the wealthy and powerful instead of the people

We really need to reform the voting system to allow for more choices of parties, but I ain't holding my breath any time soon

[–] stoly 0 points 8 months ago

You don't have to be a politician to be involved in politics. Think of all the staff, party officials, etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Hunter’s lawyers appeared before the US district judge Mark Scarsi in federal court in Los Angeles on Wednesday to press several legal challenges to the charges, including an argument that he was selectively targeted by prosecutors in response to Republican criticism.

Hunter has pleaded not guilty to failing to pay $1.4m in taxes between 2016 and 2019, while spending millions of dollars on drugs, escorts, exotic cars and other big-ticket items.

Scarsi also voiced skepticism about Hunter’s defense team’s argument that prosecutors had been pressured by two Internal Revenue Service agents who went public last year with information about his tax returns.

The trial of the president’s youngest son is due to start in June, a few months before Americans vote in a November presidential election that looks set to be a close and deeply divisive contest between Joe Biden and Donald Trump.

The special counsel David Weiss, who brought both cases, has accused Hunter Biden’s legal team of spreading “conspiracy theories” about the prosecution.

He has said the justice department would not act at the direction of Republican lawmakers, who are pursuing an impeachment investigation into whether Joe Biden profited from his son’s activities.


The original article contains 508 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 62%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!