So 44" is where it's at.
Forgotten Weapons
This is a community dedicated to discussion around historical arms, mechanically unique arms, and Ian McCollum's Forgotten Weapons content. Posts requesting an identification of a particular gun (or other arm) are welcome.
https://www.youtube.com/@ForgottenWeapons
https://www.forgottenweapons.com/
Rules:
1) Treat Others in a Civil Manner. This is not the place to deride others for their race, sexuality, or etc. Personal insults of other members are not welcome here. Neither are calls for violence.
2) No Contemporary Politics Historical politics that influenced designs or adoption of designs are excluded from this rule. Acknowledgement of existing laws to explain designs is also permissable, so long as comments aren't in made to advocate or oppose a policy. Let's not make this a place where we battle over which color ties our politicians should have, or the issues of today.
3) No Advertising This rule doesn't apply to posting historical advertisements or showing more contemporary ads as a means of displaying information on an appropriate topic. The aim of this rule is to combat spam/irrelevant advertising campaigns.
4) Keep Post on Topic This rule will be enforced with leeway. Just keep it related to arms or Forgotten Weapons or closely adjacent content. If you feel you have something that's worth posting here that isn't about either of those (and doesn't violate other rules) feel free to reach out to a mod.
5) No NSFW Content Please refrain from posting uncensored extreme gore or sexualized content. If censored these posts may be fine.
Post Guide Lines
These are suggestions not rules.
-Provide a duration for videos. eg. [12:34]
-Provide a year to either indicate when a specific design was produced, patented, or released. If you have an older design being used in a recent conflict provide the year the picture was taken. Dates should be included to help contextualize, not necessarily give exact periods.
-Post a full URL, on mobile devices it can be hard to tell what you're clicking on if you only see "(Link)".
-Posts do not have to be just firearms. Blades, bows, etc. are also welcome.
Adjacent Communities
If you run a community that you feel might fit in dm a mod and we might add your's.
Want to Find a Museum Near You? Check out the mega thread: https://lemmy.world/post/9699481
For this type of ammo. Different ammo could have different results.
I'm assuming I could get similar results from my .30 gibbs but I'd have to do more research.
I mean conceptually it makes sense regardless of cartridge size.
The longer barrel allows for the gas pressure to put more energy into the projectile. The only reason cartridge size would matter is determining the exact length for maximum energy transfer before the projectile starts losing energy through momentum.
Think of it like pushing a cart to a specific point with only one push. There's gonna be a sweet spot of force applied depending on the size of the cart.
If Sephiroth had a rifle
Barrett's been having trouble walking through doorways with his latest arm
Monster Hunter was on to something with its Gunlances.
It's interesting to see that the usual "wisdom" of too long of a barrel reducing FPS has been debunked at least for this caliber. But I will say that hacking about 10" off of my Mosin's barrel closed up its group size significantly. I think because the tip of the barrel would flex and waver around like a radio antenna every time you fired it.
There's probably some very fancy math behind the flex and resonance in a steel barrel and I'm quite certain that whatever it is, I don't know it. But I was satisified with my redneck result.
When barrels get worn out they do so at the muzzle and breech ends first. Or if the crown of your barrel was damaged that also could have lead to poor grouping.
If either of those were the case removing some of your barrel should've given you better groups. That's not to say barrel harmonics aren't real though.
Pretty much everyone who has Bubba'd a Mosin reports that lopping off some barrel improved it. You can visibly flex the tip of the barrel on a stock one with your bare hands, and without much effort. It's certainly possible the crown was fucked up too, though. Insofar as I'm aware my example was never fired before I got it other than possibly its original proofing.
I liked having a rifle that's less than 5 feet long, too. It made lugging it around much easier. I think most people have very little use case for bayoneting anyone, so I was not too broken up to see the mount for that go. The $40 scout scope I put on the thing was far better than the factory iron sights ever were or could have been. There were just positives all around.
Yes, I put it in an Archangel stock worth 4 times more than the gun. Why do you ask?
This weapon just really specifically feels like it would show up in a bossfight from the Metal Gear series.
Makes every shot a point blank shot
Makes sense, modern powder is way more powerful than black powder, so barrel length would likely increase velocity until the length isn't practical for a rifle.
Any effect on accuracy? (I didn’t read it)
Precision is more so achieved with tight tolerances rather than barrel length. Theoretically you could have a barrel too short to even stabilize a bullet but other than that length isn't tied to precision.
Perhaps when you include human or ergonomic factors a long barrel could be better utilized for accuracy than a short one. But if you had two otherwise identical rifles held in a vise with different barrel lengths you shouldn't see any appreciable difference.
Also I don't think precision was a factor they were concerned with for the purposes of their test.
TLDR: Short barrels being less accurate is a video game balancing thing.
Video on the topic: