Merrick Garland needs to shit or get off the pot.
Disenfranchising every single voter will certainly start the Civil war Russia has been heavily kindling in America.
this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
91 points (93.3% liked)
politics
19187 readers
5390 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yup.
I'm learning that my civics classes could have been condensed to: "It's all just a gentleman's agreement"
Somebody please tell me that this guy is wrong.
Yes there is a hole here. Johnson is no longer speaker of the house on January 3rd. The swearing in of members happens after a new speaker is selected (presumably a Democrat if Democrats took control). This is why for the most recent congress no one was sworn in until January 7th, after Mccarthy was finally elected as speaker after many rounds of voting.
That being said facists are gonna facist. Could Republican state governors/secretaries of states pull some shenanigans to prevent certifications of Democrat representatives or the electoral votes from their states? If Republicans retain control of the house they could absolutely do something like the article describes as well. If they have control of the house and senate they can basically make the electoral count certification procedures anything they want, refuse to seat members, lots of stuff.
The good news here is that past performance isn’t a good way of judging if they’re predictions are good this time around.
The bad news is, it seems plausible enough a thing thst… I think he might be right.
And I absolutely do not trust Johnson. He professed to have been told by Sky Daddy that he is like Moses. He believes he is acting with a divine mandate; and you just can’t reason with a guy like that.
Yeah, that's what concerns me. It definitely sounds plausible and I'm not an expert in the legalities of this, so from my outside (Australian) perspective this very much looks like a viable path for the GOP to take power. I haven't followed much of Johnson's activities either, but from what I've seen of him he strikes me as very dodgy.... much like our ex PM Scott Morrison.
it's viable in the same way that Hitler rose to power. Jan 6 is a parallel to the Beer Hall Putsch,
Though Trump never went to jail for it. it's not really legitimate, and there's no telling what would happen. I'm not convinced all the people saying 'civil war' will take up arms. They probably have a lot to loose. like their armchairs and shit.
The author left out that they would need a majority in both chambers to pull this off
Mr. Johnson also could demand that Republicans in Congress vote as a bloc on Jan. 6, 2025, against certifying election results. But he would need 20 percent of both chambers to agree to object, and then a majority of both chambers to vote to sustain the objection.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/10/26/us/politics/mike-johnson-2024-election-certification.html